arXiv Machine Learning
Correcting test set contamination by spiking the training data
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 10
Spiking the training data to correct for test set contamination
arXiv:2605. 24818v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The literature on test set contamination largely focuses on detection, but the correction of contaminated test scores is underexplored.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4
Contamination Inflates Scores but Rarely Reorders Large Language Model Leaderboards
The paper investigates how benchmark contamination—leakage of test items into training data—affects large language model (LLM) leaderboards. By comparing original test items with semantically equivalent paraphrases, the authors measure contamination as a violation of anchor-item invariance and find that it inflates absolute scores but rarely changes model rankings. Across 47 public models and 74 finetuned models on four benchmarks, the rank correlation between standard and paraphrase-controlled leaderboards is 0.997, with only a handful of cases showing differential contamination that could alter rankings.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 1
Probing Memorization of Tabular In-Context Learning
arXiv:2606. 31208v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large tabular models (LTMs), i.
arXiv AI
6d ago
Counterfactual Model Testing Under Distribution Shift
The paper addresses the problem of evaluating deployed machine learning models when their input data distribution shifts, which can arise from changes in the underlying population or from data integrity issues in the feature pipeline. It proposes an online model‑testing framework that reproduces the detected shift on a controlled baseline with known labels, distinguishing between the two mechanisms of shift to estimate current performance and potential gains from repairing data integrity problems. Experiments on real‑world datasets with simulated faults demonstrate that separating the two sources of shift generally improves performance estimates, and a churn‑prediction case study shows how these tests can guide monitoring and repair prioritization.
arXiv AI
Sep 30
WISE-ATTA: When to Ask for Labels in Budgeted Active Test-Time Adaptation
arXiv:2609.37687v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Active test-time adaptation (ATTA) improves robustness under distribution shift by updating a deployed model during inference while selectively queryin...
arXiv AI
Oct 15
WildTrace: Evaluating Training Data Detection in Realistic Large-Scale LLM Post-Training
arXiv:2610.16152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Although post-training significantly enhances model performance, the use of massive undisclosed data raises concerns about benchmark contamination an...