Source-Dependent Deference in Medical Imaging Agents Under Falsified Findings: A Pilot Audit
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
arXiv:2610.17989v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A medical vision-language model may analyze a given CT scan and correctly detect both kidneys in view. Continuing this conversation, if a user provid...
arXiv:2606. 17710v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical vision-language models report strong chest radiograph accuracy, and this is increasingly read as evidence that they use the image.
arXiv:2607. 25589v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical-imaging AI benchmarks combine datasets, DICOM rendering, prompts, provider APIs, automated labels, statistical code, manuscripts, and repository releases.
A medical vision-language model may analyze a given CT scan and correctly detect both kidneys in view. Continuing this conversation, if a user provides a prescription with an opposite direction, medic...
The study identifies a specific attention head (L8H10) in Vision Transformers that reads annotation text on chest X‑ray images instead of lung pathology, affecting 62% of COVID‑19 images. Causal inpainting experiments confirm that the head’s behavior is driven by annotation content, and removing the head increases lung attention by 1.52×. This spurious annotation‑attending behavior is consistent across multiple ViT architectures and datasets, persists after full fine‑tuning, and is invisible to standard output‑level evaluation, highlighting the need for mechanistic auditing.
arXiv:2609.15635v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A radiology report can already answer a clinical question, so it is hard to tell whether a vision-language model also uses the image. ModaLens, a pai...