arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

Learning angles for quantum approximate optimization

The paper presents a method for learning the mapping from combinatorial optimization problem instances to high‑quality variational angles for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). By training models that predict these angles, the authors replace the expensive per‑instance classical optimization with a single forward pass, achieving near‑identical solution quality while being several orders of magnitude faster. The learned models generalize to unseen graph topologies, and experiments on quantum hardware confirm that the sampled solutions are indistinguishable from those obtained with traditional solver‑derived angles.

By Johannes Jakubik, Isabelle Wittmann, Zaheed Gaffoor, Gciniwe Simphiwe Baloyi, Craig Mahlasi, Etienne Vos, Thomas Brunschwiler, Daniel J. Egger
arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago

Fully quantum training of parametric circuits with Quantum Hamiltonian Descent

The paper introduces a fully quantum method, Quantum Hamiltonian Descent (QHD), for training parametric quantum circuits by treating circuit parameters as quantum particle positions in a potential defined by the cost function. It demonstrates that, for smooth periodic cost functions, the simulation error is bounded independently of grid resolution and grows at most linearly with the number of parameters, while the dynamics depend on a single schedule curve that can be optimized to reduce gate count. Numerical simulations on benchmark functions and circuits show that schedules designed in this way significantly improve the probability of locating the global minimum compared to conventional approaches.

By Marco Burato, Leonardo Banchi
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 9

Beyond QAOA: A Review of AI and Quantum Computing for Adaptive Combinatorial Optimization

The review examines how machine learning can adapt quantum combinatorial optimization workflows by learning decisions such as formulation, penalties, shot budgets, and backend selection. It categorizes the literature into three paradigms—AI for quantum optimization, quantum for AI-driven optimization, and AI‑quantum co‑optimization—and analyzes 119 papers, finding stronger evidence for AI assisting quantum methods than for quantum enhancing learned optimizers. The authors highlight limited experimental controls, introduce an M0‑M5 evidence hierarchy, and argue that scaling is a systems problem requiring careful allocation of classical and quantum resources.

By Hoong Chuin LAU
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 21

Weighted Quantum Signal Processing: Low-Depth Polynomial Approximation with Applications to Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

arXiv:2609.21567v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum Signal Processing is a powerful quantum framework for generating and approximating univariate polynomials. However, QSP is often limited by c...

By Rohit Sarma Sarkar, Rupayan Bhattacharjee, Elias F. Combarro, Michele Grossi, Lirand\"e Pira, Carmen G. Almud\'ever, Sergi Abadal, Eduard Alarcon
arXiv AI
Jun 16

Quantum Machine Learning for Industrial Applications

arXiv:2606. 14822v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in Machine Learning have transformed numerous industrial sectors, yet classical paradigms face fundamental limitations: rapidly growing data volumes, rising computational costs, significant energy consumption, and the physical scaling limits of conventional hardware architectures.

By L\'eo Monbroussou