The review examines how machine learning can adapt quantum combinatorial optimization workflows by learning decisions such as formulation, penalties, shot budgets, and backend selection. It categorizes the literature into three paradigms—AI for quantum optimization, quantum for AI-driven optimization, and AI‑quantum co‑optimization—and analyzes 119 papers, finding stronger evidence for AI assisting quantum methods than for quantum enhancing learned optimizers. The authors highlight limited experimental controls, introduce an M0‑M5 evidence hierarchy, and argue that scaling is a systems problem requiring careful allocation of classical and quantum resources.
By Hoong Chuin LAU
arXiv:2510. 12430v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Translating a general quantum circuit on a specific hardware topology with a reduced set of available gates, also known as transpilation, comes with a substantial increase in the length of the equivalent circuit.
By Bodo Rosenhahn, Tobias J. Osborne, Christoph Hirche
arXiv:2606. 09734v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training parameterised quantum circuits (PQCs) on quantum hardware is bottlenecked by the measurement cost of gradient estimation, which under the parameter-shift rule scales linearly in the number of trainable parameters and dominates the total shot budget of training at scale.
By Brian Coyle, Snehal Raj, Virag Umathe, El Amine Cherrat, Elham Kashefi
arXiv:2604.13812v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Quantum circuit optimization is a central task in quantum computing, as current NISQ devices suffer from error propagation that often scales with t...
By Jacopo Cossio, Daniele Lizzio Bosco, Riccardo Romanello, Giuseppe Serra, Carla Piazza
The paper presents a method for learning the mapping from combinatorial optimization problem instances to high‑quality variational angles for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). By training models that predict these angles, the authors replace the expensive per‑instance classical optimization with a single forward pass, achieving near‑identical solution quality while being several orders of magnitude faster. The learned models generalize to unseen graph topologies, and experiments on quantum hardware confirm that the sampled solutions are indistinguishable from those obtained with traditional solver‑derived angles.
By Johannes Jakubik, Isabelle Wittmann, Zaheed Gaffoor, Gciniwe Simphiwe Baloyi, Craig Mahlasi, Etienne Vos, Thomas Brunschwiler, Daniel J. Egger
The paper introduces HELIA, a Hardware‑Efficient and Dynamical Lie‑Algebra Supported Ansatz, and two hybrid training methods that combine classical‑enhanced gradient computation with the quantum Parameter‑Shift Rule. By distributing gradient estimation between classical and quantum hardware, the authors reduce quantum‑resource usage while improving accuracy in Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) ground‑state estimation for 6‑ to 18‑qubit Hamiltonians and in quantum phase classification for up to 12 qubits. The methods achieve up to a 60 % reduction in logical quantum evaluations for VQE and a 2.8‑percentage‑point gain in peak test accuracy for classification, suggesting a promising path toward training larger‑qubit quantum models.
By Rahul Bhowmick, Harsh Wadhwa, Avinash Singh, Tania Sidana, Quoc Hoan Tran, Krishna Kumar Sabapathy