arXiv:2607. 11890v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Open-ended surveys offer valuable insights, but they are notoriously difficult to analyze at scale.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2609.24650v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Readability assessment is essential for tailoring texts to intended audiences across educational, healthcare, and information retrieval domains. Howeve...
The paper introduces LLM‑PeerReview, an unsupervised ensemble method that selects the best response from multiple LLM-generated candidates by scoring each answer with several LLMs, aggregating those scores via averaging or a graphical model, and choosing the highest-scoring response. The approach is peer‑review inspired, transparent, and interpretable, and it outperforms the Smoothie‑Global model by 6.9%–7.3% across factual recall QA, math reasoning, and instruction‑following tasks. The authors also provide a curated benchmark suite of 12 ensemble methods evaluated on four datasets and three task families to aid reproducibility.
arXiv:2606. 23701v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Qualitative product feedback can reveal nuanced user experiences, but its implicit sentiment is difficult to measure.
arXiv:2605.30273v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) show promise in generating supportive responses for mental health queries, but improving their usefulness, empat...
arXiv:2608. 07208v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing measures of how much a text is about a concept read the surface of the text: dictionary word shares, topic proportions, embedding similarities.
arXiv:2609.24516v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a popular alternative for evaluation. Often referred to as LLMs as judges (LLJs), these s...