arXiv Machine Learning By Gautam Chandrasekaran, Adam Klivans, Vasilis Kontonis, Raghu Meka, Konstantinos Stavropoulos

Smoothed Analysis for Learning Concepts with Low Intrinsic Dimension

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2407. 00966v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In traditional models of supervised learning, the goal of a learner-- given examples from an arbitrary joint distribution on $\mathbb{R}^d \times \{\pm 1\}$-- is to output a hypothesis that is competitive (to within $\epsilon$) of the best fitting concept from some class.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 15

Learning and Testing Convex Functions

arXiv:2511. 11498v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We consider the problems of \emph{learning} and \emph{testing} real-valued convex functions over Gaussian space.

By Renato Ferreira Pinto Jr., Cassandra Marcussen, Elchanan Mossel, Shivam Nadimpalli
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17

Efficient Robust Learning at the Information-Theoretic Limit

The paper presents a polynomial‑time algorithm for robustly learning Boolean concept classes with respect to a fixed distribution, achieving the optimal error rate of η + ε where η is the noise rate. It builds on Blanc’s earlier, computationally inefficient algorithm and introduces no‑regret learners to overcome the previous limitations. Additionally, the authors provide an efficient method that does not require an ERM oracle for any function class admitting sandwiching polynomials under hypercontractive distributions, including a first polynomial‑time solution for learning halfspaces with Gaussian marginals at error η + ε.

By Adam R. Klivans, Konstantinos Stavropoulos, Sergei Tikhonov, Arsen Vasilyan
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Relatively Smart II: Tractable or Semi-Supervised Instance-Optimal Learning

The paper extends the study of relatively smart learning, showing that ERM and any proper consistent learner are relatively smart for binary classification in the distribution‑free setting, achieving a quadratic sample‑complexity blowup. It further demonstrates that semi‑supervised relatively smart learning is possible with only a quadratic blowup in unlabeled data and no blowup in labeled data, though this requires a leave‑most‑out transductive approach and incurs intractability when only an agnostic ERM oracle is available. The results clarify the trade‑offs between sample efficiency, label efficiency, and computational tractability in relatively smart learning.

By Shaddin Dughmi, Alireza F. Pour