arXiv AI
Aug 19

A Multimodal Agentic Pathology Co-pilot via Evidence Grounded Reasoning

PathPocket is a multimodal AI co‑pilot that grounds pathology decision‑making in evidence. It builds the largest pathology evidence corpus (≈110,472 documents) and a hypergraph of 4.55 million entities and 7.10 million relations to support traceable reasoning. The system handles text and multimodal queries, including ROI and gigapixel whole‑slide images, and outperforms current state‑of‑the‑art models on a benchmark of over 200,000 real‑world cases, improving pathologists’ diagnostic accuracy and confidence.

By Zhe Xu, Zhengyu Zhang, Zhiyuan Cai, Jiahao Xu, Yijie Lin, Ziyi Liu, Junlin Hou, Hongyi Wang, Yuxiang Nie, Yihui Wang, Jiabo Ma, Ling Liang, Yingxue Xu, Zhengrui Guo, Guanghao Wu, Danyi Li, Ziqi Zhou, Donglin Tan, Zhijian Cen, Ying Tan, Xiaolin Liu, Qi Xie, Xiaoying Tang, Xi Peng, Cheng Deng, Lijuan Qu, Ronald Cheong Kin Chan, Li Liang, Hao Chen
arXiv AI
Aug 20

DentAgent: Evidence-Centric Multi-Agent Coordination for Multimodal Dental Reasoning

DentAgent is an evidence‑centric multi‑agent framework designed for multimodal dental reasoning. It coordinates five specialized agents that process domain knowledge, radiographs, intraoral photographs, and 3D dental data, converting observations into structured evidence records. The Evidence Blackboard tracks coverage, gaps, and conflicts before generating responses, and the system outperforms senior specialists by 17.3 percentage points on multi‑label diagnosis across four benchmarks.

By Zijie Meng, Xiwei Dai, Yixuan Tang, Jin Hao, Yang Feng, Fudong Zhu, Xiaoqiang Liu, Shaosheng Cao, Zuozhu Liu
arXiv AI
Jun 16

XMedFusion: A Knowledge-Guided Multimodal Perception and Reasoning Framework for Autonomous Medical Systems

arXiv:2606. 14766v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous medical and robotic systems increasingly rely on intelligent perception and reasoning capabilities to interpret visual data and support clinical decision making.

By Hamza Riaz, Arham Haroon, Maha Baig, Muhammad Dawood Rizwan, Muhammad Naseer Bajwa, Muhammad Moazam Fraz
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications

The paper reviews how Large Language Models (LLMs) are being adapted for medical reasoning, moving beyond single-step answers to systems that can systematically, transparently, and verifiably reason. It introduces a taxonomy of enhancement techniques, split into training-time methods such as supervised fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning, and test-time methods like prompt engineering and multi‑agent systems. The review examines their application across text, image, and code modalities in key clinical areas—diagnosis, education, and treatment planning—and tracks the shift in evaluation benchmarks from simple accuracy to more nuanced assessments of reasoning quality and visual interpretability.

By Zizhan Ma, Wenxuan Wang, Meidan Ding, Shiyi Zheng, Shengyuan Liu, Jie Liu, Jiaming Ji, Linlin Shen, Yixuan Yuan, Wenting Chen