arXiv Computation and Language By Yusuke Kumagae, Masahiro Kaneko

Silicon Samples Match the Answers but Not the Respondents

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

Silicon sampling creates synthetic survey respondents by having large language models answer questions as people with specified demographics, and these synthetic populations are increasingly replacing real respondents. Current evaluations focus on answer accuracy and distributional matches but do not assess whether the synthetic respondents resemble actual human respondents. The authors introduce the respondent coverage gap (RCG) metric, which measures how far each real respondent is from the nearest synthetic one, and find that all six evaluated LLMs leave human respondents uncovered, performing worse than a baseline that samples answers independently from human marginals.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Jul 7

Silicon Sampling via Cross-Survey Transfer

arXiv:2607. 03091v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Silicon sampling-using large language models (LLMs) to simulate human survey respondents-has emerged as a promising approach for augmenting traditional survey research.

By Chan-Tung Ku, Chan Hsu, Pei-Cing Huang, Frank Cheng-shan Liu, I-Ling Cheng, Yihuang Kang
arXiv AI
Aug 5

Emulate or Estimate? The Divergent Strengths of Base and Post-Trained Language Models for Opinion Simulation

arXiv:2608. 03044v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to simulate human opinions, but prior work reports conflicting results: some studies find promising alignment with human survey data, while others find persona collapse and weak demographic sensitivity.

By Seth Grief-Albert, Jessica Bo, Difan Jiao, Ashton Anderson