arXiv Machine Learning By Fabian Kreppel, Reza Salkhordeh, Ferdinand Schmidt-Kaler, Andr\'e Brinkmann

Shuttling Compiler for Trapped-Ion Quantum Computers Based on Fine-Tuned Large Language Models

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper reports on shuttling compilers for trapped‑ion quantum computers that are built using five large language models (LLMs) fine‑tuned on hand‑crafted shuttling schedules for linear and branched one‑dimensional trap architectures. For circuits up to 16 qubits, the fine‑tuned LLMs produce valid schedules on the training architectures, and in 12% of compilations the best of ten runs achieves up to 21% fewer operations than heuristic baselines after rule‑based post‑processing. A single run of one LLM also generates a valid schedule for a previously unseen four‑way branched architecture, providing preliminary evidence of cross‑architecture generalization, though no LLM succeeded on two other unseen architectures.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jul 13

QAgent: An LLM-based Multi-Agent System for Autonomous OpenQASM programming

arXiv:2508. 20134v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Programming quantum circuits at the OpenQASM level is essential for achieving hardware-aware optimization and reliable execution on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, yet it remains challenging due to the need for domain-specific planning, iterative code synthesis, and low-level calibration.

By Zhenxiao Fu, Lei Jiang, Yilun Xu, Gang Huang, Fan Chen
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

QEncodeBench: Can Large Language Models Encode Classical Problems into Verified Quantum Oracles?

QEncodeBench evaluates whether large language models can translate classical constraint problems into verified quantum phase oracles. The benchmark measures the correctness of generated circuits using an adversarial self‑validated verifier that checks full solution‑set equivalence while enforcing resource limits. Results show that models lacking a reasoning mode perform poorly, whereas enabling native reasoning improves accuracy tenfold; semantic errors dominate, and neuro‑symbolic pipelines close most gaps by delegating critical composition to deterministic procedures.

By Xujun Che, Hanhan Wu, Yuchen Yuan, Chenyang Yu