arXiv AI July 1, 2026 By Nan Li, Albert Gatt, Massimo Poesio

Seeing Is Not Sharing: Some Vision-Language Models Overestimate Common Ground in Asymmetric Dialogue

arXiv:2606. 31719v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In collaborative dialogue, shared perception does not guarantee shared interpretation.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI

Jun 9

Aligned but Not Partner-Specific: Distinguishing How Multimodal LLM Agents Succeed in Reference Games Without Human-Like Conventions

arXiv:2606. 08081v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Repeated reference games test whether interlocutors replace their initially long descriptions with shorter, partner-specific conventions grounded in shared interaction history.

By Po-Ya Angela Wang, Chinmaya Mishra, Asl{\i} \"Ozy\"urek, Paula Rubio-Fern\'andez, Esam Ghaleb

llms agents multimodal safety

arXiv AI

Jun 3

Vision Inference Former: Sustaining Visual Consistency in Multimodal Large Language Models

arXiv:2605. 18160v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In recent years, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress, primarily attributed to effective paradigms for integrating visual and textual information.

By Xinpeng Dong, Min Zhang, Kairong Han, Xu Tan, Fei Wu, Kun Kuang

llms computer-vision multimodal benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jul 21

What Makes Linguistic Representations Good Models of High-Level Visual Perception in the Human Brain?

arXiv:2607. 16214v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Image descriptions represented with language models (LMs) predict human brain responses to naturalistic images in high-level visual regions, but the factors driving this predictivity remain unclear.

By Anna Bavaresco, Ina Klari\'c, Raquel Fern\'andez, Marie-Francine Moens

llms rag fine-tuning safety

arXiv AI

Jun 16

Attention, not scale, drives human-AI alignment in multimodal language prediction

arXiv:2308. 06035v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Humans routinely draw on visual context to predict upcoming words.

By Viktor Kewenig, Andrew Lampinen, Samuel A. Nastase, Christopher Edwards, Quitterie Lacome D'Elascombe, Akilles Rechardt, Jeremy I Skipper, Gabriella Vigliocco

llms multimodal benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jul 15

Evidence Recomposition and Predictive Context Residualization for Visual Attribution in Multimodal Large Language Models

arXiv:2509. 22415v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved strong vision-language performance, yet their token-level visual evidence remains difficult to inspect.

By Jiawei Liang, Jianjie Huang, Ruoyu Chen, Xianghao Jiao, Siyuan Liang, Shiming Liu, Xiaochun Cao

llms multimodal

arXiv AI

Jun 9

IMUG-Bench: Benchmarking Unified Multimodal Models on Interleaved Understanding and Generation

arXiv:2606. 09169v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In recent years, unified multimodal models (UMMs) have emerged to support both understanding and generation within a single framework.

By Lingyi Meng, Zecong Tang, Haoran Li, Tengju Ru, Zhejun Cui, Weitong Lian, Qi Kang, Hangshuo Cao, Yichen Zhu, Yechi Liu, Kaixuan Wang, Yu-Jie Yuan, Chunwei Wang, Yu Zhang, Bo Dai

multimodal benchmarks safety

Related stories

Aligned but Not Partner-Specific: Distinguishing How Multimodal LLM Agents Succeed in Reference Games Without Human-Like Conventions

Vision Inference Former: Sustaining Visual Consistency in Multimodal Large Language Models

What Makes Linguistic Representations Good Models of High-Level Visual Perception in the Human Brain?

Attention, not scale, drives human-AI alignment in multimodal language prediction

Evidence Recomposition and Predictive Context Residualization for Visual Attribution in Multimodal Large Language Models

IMUG-Bench: Benchmarking Unified Multimodal Models on Interleaved Understanding and Generation