Gaze as Evidence for Common Grounding: A Cross-Corpus Analysis of MapTask and MUNDEX
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2606. 31719v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In collaborative dialogue, shared perception does not guarantee shared interpretation.
arXiv:2609.14207v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose to finetune vision-language models to generate more pragmatically optimal referring expressions by transforming observations of incremental...
GazeFS is a model that predicts and stabilizes target‑centered gaze trajectories using a variable‑length gaze‑head history, without requiring target information during inference. It maps this history to the next target‑center direction and a short‑horizon Search/Focus estimate, improving focus target centering and reducing residual gaze error. Across 7,960 acquisition episodes from 30 participants, GazeFS reduces Focus episode bias, dispersion, and P90 target error by 0.182°, 0.257°, and 0.400°, respectively, while maintaining high phase‑balanced accuracy and AUPRC.
arXiv:2608. 16514v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human visual search is serial: the fovea must land on a candidate to confirm it, and those landings form a scanpath.
The study investigates how gaze and speech cues, together with perceived interpersonal closeness, predict turn‑taking outcomes in free four‑person conversations. Using the GaMMA corpus, logistic regression models were trained on interpretable features such as gaze transition motifs, entropy, addressee identity, mutual gaze, and speaker loudness to classify floor‑transfer events as gaps or overlaps. Results show that gaze features alone capture predictive structure, and combining them with loudness yields a robust classifier (ROC AUC = 0.76 ± 0.04) that remains effective even under noisy conditions.
arXiv:2607. 08152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On the recent EyeBench benchmark, predicting reading comprehension from eye movements exposes a stark gap: text-aware models using pretrained language models reach 56--63% AUROC, while gaze-only models operate at chance.