arXiv AI By Zhensu Sun, Chengran Yang, Yunbo Lyu, Jieke Shi, David Lo

Second Thought: Reasoning in Parallel as LLM Agents Act and Observe

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 13667v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents in the ReAct paradigm alternate between reasoning, acting, and observing, but deliberate reasoning is confined to the Thought phase: while the agent serializes an action and waits for the environment, its reasoning is frozen.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 1

Fork-Think with Confidence

arXiv:2606. 31484v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parallel thinking has enjoyed great success for boosting LLM performance on reasoning tasks without the need for any re-training.

By Zena Al-Khalili, Rafi Hakim, Dietrich Klakow, Ji-Ung Lee
arXiv AI
Aug 26

Parason: Revealing Subtask and Trial Parallelism in LLM Reasoning

Parason is a new framework that discovers and exploits both subtask and trial parallelism in large language model (LLM) reasoning. By converting sequential reasoning traces into structured parallel trajectories and training with Parallelism-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization, it balances accuracy, latency, and parallelism. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks such as AIME24 and AIME25 show that Parason achieves an average acceleration of about 1.7× while maintaining competitive accuracy.

By Zhengyang Zhang, Zijian Zhang, Jiaxuan Gao, Shusheng Xu, Yi Wu, Song Han, Ligeng Zhu
arXiv AI
Sep 4

</think> Doesn't Stop Reasoning: Analysis of Spurious CoT Termination

The paper investigates a training‑free early‑exit technique that inserts an end‑of‑think (EoT) token to terminate chain‑of‑thought (CoT) reasoning in large reasoning models. It finds that the injected EoT often fails to cleanly switch the model from reasoning to answering, leading to continued reasoning‑like generation—termed spurious CoT termination—whose length scales with the amount of reasoning saved. By increasing attention to the EoT token through Exit‑token Attention Biasing (EAB), the authors reduce spurious termination and shorten the answering phase across multiple models and benchmarks.

By Seunghee Koh, Sungjae Choi, Minchan Kwon, Sunghyun Baek, Junmo Kim