arXiv Machine Learning By Zena Al-Khalili, Rafi Hakim, Dietrich Klakow, Ji-Ung Lee

Fork-Think with Confidence

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 31484v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parallel thinking has enjoyed great success for boosting LLM performance on reasoning tasks without the need for any re-training.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jun 15

Fractured Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

arXiv:2505. 12992v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Inference-time scaling techniques have significantly bolstered the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by harnessing additional computational effort at inference without retraining.

By Baohao Liao, Hanze Dong, Yuhui Xu, Doyen Sahoo, Christof Monz, Junnan Li, Caiming Xiong
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 2

Message Passing Enables Efficient Reasoning

arXiv:2607. 01077v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While inference-time scaling has improved the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs), the need to generate long chains-of-thought (CoTs) is a computational bottleneck.

By Xuecheng Liu, Daman Arora, Gokul Swamy, Andrea Zanette
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 5

Fewer Tokens, Smaller Cache: Reward-Coordinated Efficient Reasoning

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel on complex tasks through long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, but their lengthy intermediate steps cause severe overthinking that inflates inference cost. KV-cache compression is a common solution, yet existing reasoning-oriented methods apply a uniform policy across the trajectory and judge compression only by what it removes from the cache.