arXiv AI By Prateek Chaturvedi, Yuqicheng Zhu, Hongkuan Zhou, Dongzhuoran Zhou, Yunjie He, Steffen Staab, Fei Du, Jie Tang, Evgeny Kharlamov

SCAIR: Schema-Conditioned Agentic Iterative Reasoning for Enterprise Knowledge Graphs

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 22571v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (KG-RAG) enables natural language interaction with structured enterprise knowledge, yet existing agentic approaches that perform well on public benchmarks often fail to generalize to real-world enterprise Knowledge Graphs (KGs), which are dense, schema-driven, and operationally constrained.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 4

A Cost-Aware Agentic Architecture for NL-to-SQL over Nested Enterprise Schemas, with a New Benchmark

The paper introduces the DevRev NL2SQL benchmark, comprising 900 execution‑verified queries that feature nested‑type and link‑graph structures, along with the Semantic Depth Score (SDS) to assess analytical reasoning depth. It also presents a cost‑aware single‑generation agentic architecture that includes schema selection, metadata retrieval, and error‑repair components tailored to nested enterprise schemas. On the DevRev benchmark, the system achieves 91.7% answer correctness, outperforming the next‑best baseline by 54.6 percentage points, and remains competitive on the Spider 2.0 Snowflake dataset.

arXiv AI
Sep 7

A Cost-Aware Agentic Architecture for NL-to-SQL over Nested Enterprise Schemas, with a New Benchmark

The paper introduces the DevRev NL2SQL benchmark, featuring 900 execution‑verified queries that test natural‑language‑to‑SQL systems on nested, graph‑like enterprise schemas, and proposes the Semantic Depth Score (SDS) as a rubric for analytical reasoning depth. It also presents a cost‑aware, single‑generation agentic architecture that includes schema selection, metadata retrieval, and error‑repair components tailored to these complex schemas. On the DevRev benchmark, the system achieves 91.7% answer correctness, outperforming the next‑best baseline by 54.6 percentage points, and remains competitive on the Spider 2.0 Snowflake dataset.

By Yoga Sri Varshan Varadharajan, Ajay Yadav, Ritesh Goru, Prateek Chaudhury, Constantine Caramanis, Prateek Jain, Divyateja Pasupuleti, Sunil Kumar Pandey