Hypergraph Enterprise Agentic Reasoner over Heterogeneous Business Systems
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2607. 22571v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (KG-RAG) enables natural language interaction with structured enterprise knowledge, yet existing agentic approaches that perform well on public benchmarks often fail to generalize to real-world enterprise Knowledge Graphs (KGs), which are dense, schema-driven, and operationally constrained.
arXiv:2607. 07721v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and agentic frameworks have advanced enterprise AI considerably, yet agents remain fundamentally reactive: they wait for a human query before acting.
The paper introduces Symbolic Separation, a method that grounds deep learning agents in knowledge graphs to improve reliability in operational data analytics. By restricting agent actions to an ontology-constrained Virtual Knowledge Graph with deterministic pre-execution validation, the approach transforms complex queries into validated graph traversals rather than relying on LLM-inferred joins. In experiments on 49.9 TB of supercomputer telemetry, the Neurosymbolic Deep Analyst achieved an 86% task‑success rate, eliminated silent data‑integrity errors, and reduced token costs by 2.4× compared to a non‑symbolic baseline.
arXiv:2607. 19297v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper is a practitioner guide to graph-based workflow pathways for long-running, stateful, multi-step generative AI systems in business processes.
The paper introduces the DevRev NL2SQL benchmark, featuring 900 execution‑verified queries that test natural‑language‑to‑SQL systems on nested, graph‑like enterprise schemas, and proposes the Semantic Depth Score (SDS) as a rubric for analytical reasoning depth. It also presents a cost‑aware, single‑generation agentic architecture that includes schema selection, metadata retrieval, and error‑repair components tailored to these complex schemas. On the DevRev benchmark, the system achieves 91.7% answer correctness, outperforming the next‑best baseline by 54.6 percentage points, and remains competitive on the Spider 2.0 Snowflake dataset.
arXiv:2607. 18816v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-powered agents increasingly tackle complex tasks by invoking tools, querying databases, executing code, and manipulating intermediate artifacts.