arXiv:2607. 23159v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-time search lets small video diffusion models rival larger ones, but costs 2-10x more.
By Shreshth Saini, Neil Birkbeck, Yilin Wang, Balu Adsumilli, Alan C. Bovik
arXiv:2608.23565v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: An interactive world model must follow the user's actions, remember the places it has shown, and stream in real time. The tension is structural: contro...
By Zhifei Chen, Luozhou Wang, Guibao Shen, Dongyu Yan, Shuai Yang, Tianshuo Xu, Yihua Du, Wei Wang, Tianyi Gui, Lianghua Huang, Yingcong Chen
The study investigates how long‑video language models decide which frames to keep, compress, and reuse, testing each decision in isolation across six selection rules, three benchmarks, and two answering models. It finds that selecting frames based on queries yields the biggest performance boost, that halving spatial resolution costs little, and that reallocating saved tokens to more compressed frames can further improve accuracy. The work also highlights the importance of a unified evaluation harness to avoid misleading comparisons.
By Prakhar Khatri
An interactive world model must follow the user's actions, remember the places it has shown, and stream in real time. The tension is structural: control wants a short horizon, memory wants an unbounde...
arXiv:2608. 15043v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Video world models are increasingly used as simulators for planning and embodied decision making, yet improving them at inference time introduces a subtle evaluation problem: prompts, samplers, verifiers, and selectors may evolve together, making it difficult to attribute gains or prevent held-out feedback from shaping the final policy.
By Yuhua Jiang, Jiaming Wang, Qingbin Liu, Feifei Gao
The paper introduces a sparse, residual world model that focuses on predicting only the changes in a scene by using a per-object change gate and a residual delta head. On a MuJoCo tabletop pushing benchmark, this approach outperforms a dense multilayer perceptron, achieving 2.5 to 4.6 times better next‑state pose accuracy with 8.6 to 11.1 times fewer parameters, maintaining high change‑detection F1 scores, and showing strong transfer across object counts. In autoregressive rollout and sampling‑based planning, the sparse model accumulates less error and enables successful planning where dense models fail.
By Param Thakkar, Parsika Paresh Shah, Manisha Sushant Gote