Hugging Face Trending Papers July 2, 2026

Safety Targeted Embedding Exploit via Refinement

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Safety training for large language models (LLMs) is conducted predominantly in English, leaving uncertain how well safety mechanisms generalize to low-resource languages and mixed-language code-switching. We show that this creates an epistemic gap in which models confidently generate harmful responses for inputs that fall outside the distribution of their safety training.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI

Jul 3

Safety Targeted Embedding Exploit via Refinement

arXiv:2607. 01859v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety training for large language models (LLMs) is conducted predominantly in English, leaving uncertain how well safety mechanisms generalize to low-resource languages and mixed-language code-switching.

By Joshua Adrian Cahyono

llms rag safety

Hugging Face Trending Papers

Jun 4

Safety Paradox: How Enhanced Safety Awareness Leaves LLMs Vulnerable to Posterior Attack

Large language models (LLMs) are rigorously aligned to refuse harmful requests, a process that inherently cultivates a latent capacity to evaluate and recognize unsafe content. In this work, we reveal that this advanced safety awareness inadvertently introduces a fatal vulnerability.

llms reinforcement-learning safety

arXiv AI

Jun 3

Patcher: Post-Hoc Patching of Backdoored Large Language Models

arXiv:2606. 02995v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models remain vulnerable to jailbreak backdoor attacks, where adversaries poison safety alignment data to embed hidden triggers that bypass safety mechanisms.

By Anjun Gao, Yueyang Quan, Yufei Xia, Zhuqing Liu, Minghong Fang

llms fine-tuning safety

arXiv AI

Jul 20

Latent Fusion Jailbreak: Blending Harmful and Harmless Representations to Elicit Unsafe LLM Outputs

arXiv:2508. 10029v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Safety-aligned large language models can still be manipulated through white-box interventions that modify their internal representations.

By Wenpeng Xing, Bohan Yang, Mohan Li, Chunqiang Hu, Haitao Xu, Ningyu Zhang, Bo Lin, Meng Han

llms multimodal benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jul 14

Minionese: Comprehensive Benchmark and Mechanistic Study of Multilingual LLM Safety

arXiv:2607. 10112v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety alignment in large language models remains brittle across languages: prompts reliably refused in English can elicit harmful compliance in non-English and low-resource settings.

By Chigozirim Ifebi, Brent Kong, Ayushi Mehrotra

llms benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jun 6

Safety Paradox: How Enhanced Safety Awareness Leaves LLMs Vulnerable to Posterior Attack

arXiv:2606. 05614v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are rigorously aligned to refuse harmful requests, a process that inherently cultivates a latent capacity to evaluate and recognize unsafe content.

By Long P. Hoang, Hai V. Le, Shaoyang Xu, Wei Lu, Wenxuan Zhang

llms reinforcement-learning safety

Related stories

Safety Targeted Embedding Exploit via Refinement

Safety Paradox: How Enhanced Safety Awareness Leaves LLMs Vulnerable to Posterior Attack

Patcher: Post-Hoc Patching of Backdoored Large Language Models

Latent Fusion Jailbreak: Blending Harmful and Harmless Representations to Elicit Unsafe LLM Outputs

Minionese: Comprehensive Benchmark and Mechanistic Study of Multilingual LLM Safety

Safety Paradox: How Enhanced Safety Awareness Leaves LLMs Vulnerable to Posterior Attack