arXiv:2608. 04330v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Removing the left context from a causal language model reveals a useful kind of boundary: an edge where the model processes the same right-hand tokens with little change.
By Mike Vegeto
arXiv:2608. 04021v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cloze-style probes that vary how often a target token appears implicitly assume that more copies of a target affect prediction the same way regardless of where the readout slot sits.
By Han-yu Wang
The study investigates how layer‑wise intervention responses in language models change over the course of pretraining, using single‑block identity bypass across multiple checkpoints and model‑domain combinations. It finds that while depth ordering of responses persists, their magnitudes shift, with nearby checkpoints showing stronger rank correspondence than distant ones and large changes occurring at positions that recur across samples and transfer across evaluation domains. Controlled experiments reveal that these longitudinal changes cannot be explained by a single downstream sensitivity and depend on perturbation strength and direction, indicating that layer sensitivity is structured but dynamic.
By Shengye Tao, Yinzhu Cheng, Haihua Xie
The paper introduces LatentPort, a method that allows a language model to transfer its live memory to another model without requiring the receiver to reread the context. Experiments on a Qwen3.5 4B-to-9B sibling pair show that adding a Gated DeltaNet (GDN) persistent-state package reduces negative log‑likelihood by 0.747 nats/token and improves performance across 64 PG19 documents. The study also demonstrates that direct recurrent and convolution reuse outperforms learned GDN maps, and a 434,176‑parameter correction further narrows the performance gap to the native 9B model.
By Simon P. Villani
The paper investigates how six naturalistic and synthetic input perturbations affect decoder‑only language models at three levels: output behavior, hidden‑state geometry, and attention‑head function. Using GPT‑2 and Qwen2.5 checkpoints, the authors analyze layerwise geometry with centered kernel alignment and intrinsic dimension, and examine attention‑head responses in GPT‑2. They find that perturbation types produce distinct metric profiles that are not fully captured by output measures and vary across checkpoints, highlighting the need for multi‑level evaluation of robustness.
By Dun Li Chan, Emily Liu, Niyathi Allu, Christian Hoang
The paper introduces a three-level evaluation framework—behavioral deployment, LM-head readout, and probe recoverability—to distinguish whether a language model fails a syntactic test by not encoding structure or by failing to use it. Using a trilingual control-dependency benchmark, the authors find that probe recoverability consistently exceeds LM-head readout, which in turn exceeds behavioral deployment across seven models and three languages, with the largest gap observed in Qwen3-0.6B Instruct. Layer-localized activation patching shows that instruction tuning shifts the decoded layer later, suggesting decoding favors surface shortcuts and that behavioral evaluation understates what models encode while probing alone overstates what they deploy.
By Zhenyan Lu, He Wang, Xiaohui Huang