arXiv AI By Suhaas Garre, Erik Knutsen, Sushant Mehta, Edwin Chen

Riemann-Bench: A Benchmark for Moonshot Mathematics

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2604. 06802v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent AI systems have achieved gold-medal-level performance on the International Mathematical Olympiad, demonstrating remarkable proficiency at competition-style problem solving.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

MathNet: a Global Multimodal Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning and Retrieval

arXiv:2604. 18584v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Mathematical problem solving remains a challenging test of reasoning for large language and multimodal models, yet existing benchmarks are limited in size, language coverage, and task diversity.

By Shaden Alshammari, Kevin Wen, Abrar Zainal, Mark Hamilton, Navid Safaei, Sultan Albarakati, William T. Freeman, Antonio Torralba
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Measuring Progress in Reasoning Toward Mathematical Discovery with Automatic Verification

The paper introduces HorizonMath, a benchmark of 113 largely unsolved mathematical problems across eight domains, paired with an open-source framework for automated verification. It focuses on the generator‑verifier gap, targeting problems that are hard to discover but easy to verify computationally, thereby avoiding costly formal proof verification or manual review. Using this framework, the authors found six novel solutions—three each from GPT‑5.4 Pro and GPT‑5.6 Sol—demonstrating that current models can contribute to mathematical research, while most state‑of‑the‑art models score below 10%.

By Erik Y. Wang, Sumeet R. Motwani, James V. Roggeveen, Eliot Hodges, Dulhan Jayalath, Charles London, Kalyan Ramakrishnan, Jakob Foerster, Cheng Zhang, Flaviu Cipcigan, Philip Torr, Alessandro Abate
arXiv AI
Jul 16

AIMO Interpretability Challenge

arXiv:2607. 13899v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose the AIMO Interpretability Challenge, a competition on distinguishing robust from spurious reasoning in frontier mathematical language models based on the models' internal mechanisms.

By Michal \v{S}tef\'anik, Philipp Mondorf, Andreas Waldis, Qianying Liu, Chuan Yang, Michal Spiegel, Josef Kucha\v{r}, Marek Kadl\v{c}\'ik, Adam Vawda-Oomerjee, Chaoran Liu, Simon Frieder, Barbara Plank, Fazl Barez, Pontus Stenetorp
arXiv AI
Sep 3

AI Mathematician: Towards Fully Automated Frontier Mathematical Research

The paper introduces the AI Mathematician (AIM) framework, which leverages Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) to tackle frontier mathematical research. AIM addresses the complexity and procedural rigor of research problems through an exploration mechanism for longer solution paths and a pessimistic reasonable verification method for reliability. Early experiments show AIM can autonomously construct significant proof components and uncover non‑trivial insights across real‑world mathematical topics.

By Yuanhang Liu, Yanxing Huang, Yanqiao Wang, Peng Li, Yang Liu
arXiv AI
Sep 1

ScienceArena: Benchmarking LLMs on Latest Scientific Olympiad Competitions

arXiv:2608.30517v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmark saturation and data contamination increasingly obscure genuine scientific reasoning in frontier LLMs. We introduce \textsc{ScienceArena}, an...

By Guangxiang Zhao, Qilong Shi, Xusen Xiao, Wenpu Liu, Yaoming Li, Linfeng Hao, Shuyang Hou, Zijian Guo, Xinrui Zhang, Yuntian Zhao, Zhengyang Wang, Wenrui Liu, Yuhan Wu, Tong Yang, Lin Sun, Xiangzheng Zhang