← Back to all news
arXiv AI By Jingnan Zheng, Dongcheng Zhang, Yi Zhang, Ming Zhang, Qiaosheng Zhang, Youbang Sun, An Zhang, Xiangnan He, Tat-Seng Chua, Xia Hu, Bowen Zhou, Chaochao Lu, Xiang Wang

ReSI: Recursive Safety Improvement toward Resistant and Resilient AI

Read the original on arXiv AI →

ReSI is a recursive safety improvement framework that iteratively applies diverse red‑teaming methods to identify vulnerabilities in AI models, develops training recipes, and selects the update with the greatest safety gain while retaining capability. Across four dense and mixture‑of‑experts models, ReSI matches or surpasses frontier models on both in‑distribution and out‑of‑distribution safety benchmarks, and outperforms alignment baselines on nearly all safety evaluations. The framework notably reduces the mean X‑Teaming attack success rate from 86.01% to 31.45%, outperforming GPT‑5.6‑Luna’s 56.69% and demonstrating stronger resilience to unseen attacks.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Oct 7

SIGMA: Self-Improving Alignment Generalization from a Model Spec

SIGMA is a self‑improving alignment framework that uses a model’s own reasoning to generate diverse alignment dilemma scenarios from a simple "Model Spec" and then fine‑tunes the model with self‑judged rewards. By performing spec‑guided task synthesis and rubric‑based reinforcement learning, SIGMA improves safety alignment in multi‑turn agentic settings, reducing harmfulness and misalignment scores while preserving general capability. The approach demonstrates that a model can autonomously strengthen its own safety reasoning without external supervision.

By Jingyu Zhang, Shruti Palaskar, Daniel Khashabi, Benjamin Van Durme, Leon A. Gatys, Joseph Yitan Cheng
llmsagentsreinforcement-learningfine-tuningsafety
More like this →
arXiv AI
Sep 28

Evolutionary Safety of Recursive Self-Improving AI: Taxonomy, Risk Discovery, and Evaluation

The paper introduces the concept of Evolutionary Safety for recursive self-improving AI, focusing on how safety properties evolve as an AI system and its successors change. It identifies key risks such as intent drift, error accumulation, and safety-property erosion, and presents a taxonomy covering agent state, model state, evaluation, environment, and update mechanisms. The authors propose methods for discovering and evaluating evolutionary risks, and outline governance principles for modification, selection, authorization, provenance, and recovery, while highlighting open problems for maintaining safety in persistent, adaptive, and recursively self-improving systems.

By Chang Gong, Jingping Bi, Di Yao, Xinjian Liang, Chao Xiang, Ruijie Guo
agentssafety
More like this →
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 13

HyperSafe: Inference-Time Safety Recovery for Fine-Tuned Language Models

Safety alignment in large language models can be fragile under fine-tuning, as even benign task adaptation may increase harmful compliance. Existing defenses mainly follow two directions: they either intervene during or after fine-tuning through retraining or weight modification, which can be costly and may hurt task performance, or they use model-agnostic safety classifiers, which may miss failures specific to a given fine-tuned checkpoint.

llmsfine-tuningbenchmarkssafety
More like this →
arXiv AI
Jun 19

LLM agent safety, multi-turn red-teaming, jailbreak benchmarks, adversarial robustness, safety-critical systems

arXiv:2606. 20408v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly proposed as supervisory components for safety-critical systems, yet their robustness under sustained, adaptive adversarial pressure remains poorly characterized.

By Hanwool Lee, Dasol Choi, Bokyeong Kim, Seung Geun Kim, Haon Park
llmsagentsbenchmarkssafety
More like this →