arXiv Computer Vision
Representation Conditioning for Generation
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
2d ago
Purify Before You Align: Improving Representation Alignment for Diffusion Models
The paper proposes Local Appearance Purification (LAP), a method that refines the alignment target for diffusion models by removing locally predictable content and focusing on the residual. LAP improves generation quality across multiple pretrained encoders, notably reducing FID from 53.1 to 42.3 on ImageNet-256 with MAE. The authors provide a theoretical framework linking alignment effectiveness to the information emphasized by the target and introduce a constant‑readout test to predict purification benefits.
arXiv AI
Sep 30
Representation by Design in Generation: Cross-View Class-Token Alignment in Diffusion Transformers
arXiv:2609.36348v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative and representation learning remain asymmetrically connected: semantic representations are used to improve diffusion generation, whereas th...
arXiv AI
Jun 16
Improved Baselines with Representation Autoencoders
arXiv:2605. 18324v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Representation Autoencoders (RAE) replace traditional VAE with pretrained vision encoders.
arXiv AI
Jun 2
Improving Visual Representation Alignment Generation with GRPO
arXiv:2606. 00583v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent diffusion transformers have demonstrated strong image synthesis capabilities but remain inefficient to train due to weak alignment between generative and discriminative representations.
arXiv Computer Vision
2d ago
Retrofitting Recurrent Vision-Language Models from Pretrained Backbones
The paper introduces a method to retrofit depth recurrence into pretrained vision‑language models, reducing the language backbone’s parameter count by pruning layers and looping over the remaining ones with linear adapters. A three‑stage recovery training—language‑only pretraining, vision‑language projector alignment, and full fine‑tuning—helps recover performance, with distillation from the non‑recurrent model further improving results. Experiments on TinyLLaVA‑1.4B show the retrofitted recurrent model outperforms the unpruned baseline while saving 23.3% of language parameters and performs better on reasoning‑oriented benchmarks.
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 28
FuseReg: Regularizing Layer Fusion Mitigates the Reconstruction-Generation Gap in Representation Autoencoders
arXiv:2609.31620v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Representation autoencoders (RAEs) reuse features from a pretrained visual encoder as reconstruction and diffusion latents, integrating strong visual r...