arXiv:2509. 02581v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the growing availability of tools designed to support scholarly knowledge extraction and organization, many researchers still rely on manual methods, sometimes due to unfamiliarity with existing technologies or limited access to domain-adapted solutions.
By Azanzi Jiomekong, Hande K\"u\c{c}\"uk McGinty, Keith G. Mills, Allard Oelen, Enayat Rajabi, Harry McElroy, Antrea Christou, Anmol Saini, Janice Anta Zebaze, Hannah Kim, Anna M. Jacyszyn, Gollam Rabby, Dirk Betz, Claudia Biniossek, Sanju Tiwari, S\"oren Auer
arXiv:2607. 20328v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This study empirically analyzed generative AI as an emerging discovery pathway to academic library resources.
By Hae Min Kim, Stacy Stanislaw
arXiv:2607. 04049v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We argue that generative AI can degrade research by eroding the very practices through which scholarly judgement is formed and academic trust is built.
By Claudio Novelli, Luciano Floridi
arXiv:2608. 08883v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and large language models (LLMs) enable researchers to integrate AI into scientific workflows.
By Jack Stark, Srinath Saikrishnan, Vikram Seenivasan, Bernie Boscoe, Andrew Lizarraga, Tuan Do
arXiv:2606. 20235v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Academic paper search is a core step in scientific research, and LLM-based search agents are emerging as a promising paradigm for iterative, intent-driven literature exploration.
By Tingyue Pan, Mingyue Cheng, Daoyu Wang, Yitong Zhou, Jie Ouyang, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen
arXiv:2605.30947v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: LLM-based research agents have advanced rapidly in science and engineering, where research is organized around executable experiments, code, and qu...
By Yating Pan, Jiajun Zhang, Jun Wang, Qi Su