arXiv:2609.16519v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Scientific research increasingly relies on large, heterogeneous data sources, motivating interest in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems that...
By Bernie Boscoe, Srinath Saikrishnan, Vikram Seenivasan, Jack Stark, Andrew Lizarraga, Morgan Himes, Jonathan Soriano, PJ Allen, Tuan Do
Scientific research increasingly relies on large, heterogeneous data sources, motivating interest in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems that provide natural language access to scientific kno...
The paper surveys recent advances in Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), a technique that integrates external retrieval into language model generation to reduce hallucinations and keep knowledge current. It introduces a four‑axis taxonomy—efficiency, defense, interactivity, and reasoning—to organize contemporary RAG research, covering retrieval methods, fusion strategies, embedding optimizations, and reinforcement learning policies. The survey also reviews evaluation practices, domain‑specific applications, and architectural variants, while highlighting ongoing challenges such as retrieval quality, reliability, domain adaptation, scalability, and explainability.
By Meghana Sunil, Shravya V, Shravan Venkatraman, Joe Dhanith PR
arXiv:2509. 23426v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: AI scientists are emerging computational systems that serve as collaborative partners in discovery.
By Shanghua Gao, Richard Zhu, Pengwei Sui, Zhenglun Kong, Sufian Aldogom, Yepeng Huang, Ayush Noori, Reza Shamji, Krishna Parvataneni, Theodoros Tsiligkaridis, Marinka Zitnik
The paper introduces Biomedica, an open-source dataset sourced from PubMed Central that includes over 6 million scientific articles and 24 million image‑text pairs, along with 27 metadata fields and expert human annotations. To facilitate use, the authors provide scalable streaming and search APIs via a web server. They demonstrate the dataset’s value by training embedding models, chat‑style models, and retrieval‑augmented chat agents, all of which outperform previous open systems in their categories.
By Alejandro Lozano, Min Woo Sun, James Burgess, Jeffrey J. Nirschl, Christopher Polzak, Yuhui Zhang, Liangyu Chen, Jeffrey Gu, Ivan Lopez, Josiah Aklilu, Anita Rau, Austin Wolfgang Katzer, Collin Chiu, Orr Zohar, Xiaohan Wang, Alfred Seunghoon Song, Chiang Chia-Chun, Robert Tibshirani, Serena Yeung-Levy
arXiv:2607. 00013v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are widely used in institutional question answering settings where responses must be grounded in authoritative documentation (Gao et al.
By Asit Desai, Aman Kumar, Prashant Devadiga
arXiv:2503. 10677v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has gained significant attention in recent years for its potential to enhance natural language understanding and generation by combining large-scale retrieval systems with generative models.
By Mingyue Cheng, Yucong Luo, Jie Ouyang, Qi Liu, Huijie Liu, Li Li, Shuo Yu, Bohou Zhang, Jiawei Cao, Jie Ma, Daoyu Wang, Enhong Chen
arXiv:2607. 20926v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific research involves complex information-seeking and reasoning workflows across heterogeneous sources.
By Yinhao Tang, Youqing Fang, Yanan Sun, Wenran Liu, Weiming Zhang, Bin Liu, Kuikun Liu, Wenwei Zhang, Kai Chen
arXiv:2605. 16902v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scientific artifacts such as models and datasets are foundations for research.
By Haofei Yu, Jiaxuan You, Peter Clark, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Kyle Richardson
arXiv:2606. 13710v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep research and agent evolution serve as de-facto tasks for AI agents in real-world applications toward artificial general intelligence.
By Hongming Piao, Chi Liu, Mengzhuo Chen, Yan Shu, Derek Li, Ying Wei, Bryan Dai
arXiv:2607. 16845v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientists at European XFEL conduct experiments that generate very large and complex datasets.
By Tim Fuchs, Luca Gelisio, Steffen Hauf, Walid Maalej
The paper investigates whether domain-specific fine‑tuning benefits open‑ended scientific reasoning in astronomy. Using a curated 300‑question QA benchmark from 2017–2026 Olympiad‑style materials, the authors compare open‑weight, API‑served general‑purpose, multimodal, and astronomy‑specialized language models. Results show that strong general‑purpose models set the highest correctness baseline, but variations in metric agreement, judge sensitivity, benchmark composition, and modality suggest that domain specialization is task‑ and deployment‑dependent and that domain‑specific evaluation is crucial for scientific workflows.
By Vanessa Lama, Sanjay Das, Emily Herron, Yuan-Sen Ting, Tijmen de Haan, Junqi Yin, Tirthankar Ghosal, Feiyi Wang