arXiv:2512.20257v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: With the rise of easily accessible generative tools for creating and manipulating multimedia content, the threat of realistic synthetic alterations...
By Daniele Cardullo, Simone Teglia, Irene Amerini
MM-VeriAgent is a reinforcement‑learning framework that learns to verify multimodal misinformation by leveraging a specialized toolkit called MM-VeriTools. The toolkit encapsulates the strongest models for textual, visual, and cross‑modal forgery analysis as callable tools with a unified interface. To improve training efficiency, the authors introduce a Tool‑Execution Cache that pre‑executes candidate tool calls and reuses cached outputs, resulting in substantial accuracy gains on MMFakeBench and reduced online tool executions during training.
By Peipei Li, Shuhan Xia, Shengyang Liu, Zekun Li, Ran He
The paper investigates whether multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can generate and detect realistic multimodal fake news on social media. Using a multi‑agent framework—comprising a story agent, an image agent, and a critic agent—the authors produced over 9,000 paired multimodal news posts across science, health, and entertainment domains. They benchmarked 16 open‑ and closed‑source MLLMs for automated detection and found that most models fall far short of human accuracy, especially in identifying image authenticity, highlighting the need for stronger defenses against social media fake news.
By Jiyao Yang, Yang Liu, Zhenyue Qin, Qingyu Chen, Xiuzhen Zhang
The paper investigates an agentic framework for open‑world fake image detection that combines specialist detectors with per‑detector triage, prompting, and conflict‑aware evidence arbitration. Experiments across six configurations and three multimodal large language model backbones reveal that naive detector fusion yields high false‑positive rates, while triage and prompting consistently filter unreliable evidence. The most significant improvement comes from the reasoning component: a stronger judge markedly outperforms a weaker one, especially under distribution shift, and overall manipulation recall is nearly saturated, highlighting that the key challenge lies in calibrating trust and arbitrating conflicting forensic evidence rather than detecting manipulations themselves.
By Xianlong Li (IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Italy), Pietro Bongini (University of Siena, Italy), Niccol\'o Pancino (University of Siena, Italy), Marco Blanchini (IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Italy), Benedetta Tondi (University of Siena, Italy), Mauro Barni (University of Siena, Italy)
arXiv:2510.23508v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Existing real-world datasets for multimodal fact-checking have multiple limitations: they contain few instances, cover only one or two languages, f...
By Jiahui Geng, Jonathan Tonglet, Iryna Gurevych
The paper investigates how different multimodal design choices affect the performance of misinformation detection systems. Using over 3,375 experiments across three benchmark datasets and various pre‑trained vision and language models, the authors systematically compare design options and conduct robustness analyses. The study offers practical guidance on which choices improve detection, when they may fail silently, and which pipeline components most influence model behavior, addressing four key research questions.
By Akshit Sharma, Prashant W. Patil