← Back to all news
arXiv Machine Learning By Mohammad Khoshnazar, Mohammad Dehghani Tezerjani, Zhiyuan Gao, Deyuan Qu, Max Gandyra, Yanxiang Zhan, Mehreen Naeem, Andrew Melnik, Jeroen Schafer, Qing Yang, Michael Beetz

Reliability-Aware Future Conditioning for Temporally Robust Robot Manipulation

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces Reliability‑Aware Future Conditioning (RAFC), a method that dynamically estimates how much to trust a generated future video clip and selects the most appropriate temporal hypothesis for robot manipulation tasks. By treating temporal misalignment as a control problem rather than a generation problem, RAFC improves success rates on the CALVIN benchmark and a Franka robot under various timing mismatches, outperforming static and uniform‑averaging baselines. The approach builds on Future‑Experience Conditioning (FEC) and learns solely from task reward without explicit alignment supervision.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Sep 18

From Rollout to Reset: A Graph-Based Harness for Autonomous Long-Horizon Manipulation Evaluation

The paper introduces HALTER, a graph-based system that automates the reset and evaluation of long-horizon robot manipulation tasks. HALTER constructs a spatial scene graph from point clouds and vision models, uses an LLM to score rollouts, plan resets, and verify success, all without labeled success images. In experiments on a Franka arm, HALTER restores scenes in 76% of episodes, improves skill completion estimation, and reduces operator time by 72% compared to manual reset.

By Jing Jiang, Yue Yang, Xinkai Jiang, Gedas Bertasius, Daniel J. Szafir, Rudolf Lioutikov
llmsagentsrobotics
More like this →
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

World-Coherent Decoding: Self-Verifying Test-Time Planning for World Action Models

World-Coherent Decoding (WCD) is a test-time planning framework for World Action Models (WAMs) that treats rollouts as falsifiable future–action hypotheses. At each decision step, WCD samples multiple candidates from a frozen WAM and ranks them using flow-based video surprisal for visual plausibility and action path effort for generation stability. After execution, the observed outcome audits the chosen imagination, producing a mismatch signal that trains a lightweight online predictor to improve future candidate selection, thereby enhancing reliability without updating the backbone model.

By Chuhan Zhang, Seiji Ito, Kenta Hoshino, Satoshi Ikehata, Ikuro Sato
robotics
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 21

Foresight Residual RL for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation with Vision-Language-Action Models

arXiv:2607. 16506v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies offer strong general-purpose manipulation priors, but often fail on tight-tolerance, contact-rich assembly due to long-horizon credit assignment and subtask coupling: a state that is geometrically successful for the current skill can be brittle for downstream skills.

By Yuhan Liu, Xinyu Zhang, Litao Liu, Abdeslam Boularias
reinforcement-learningroboticsmultimodal
More like this →
arXiv AI
Aug 24

ForeTime-VLA: Causal Future-Token Distillation from a World Action Model for Conveyor-Belt Manipulation

ForeTime‑VLA is a causal vision‑language‑action policy that distills future‑aware representations from a frozen Fast‑WAM teacher, enabling it to anticipate contact events during conveyor‑belt manipulation. The method compresses current and future video latents into a 64‑dimensional target, uses an eight‑frame history encoder to predict this target along with manipulation phase and time‑to‑transition, and conditions a VLM prefix on future tokens and phase. On a deduplicated conveyor‑belt dataset, ForeTime‑VLA reduces test MAE by 2.63% and L2 by 3.02%, while real‑robot experiments show significantly higher grasp success rates compared to the next‑best reference. whyItMatters":"The approach demonstrates that distilling future‑token knowledge from a world‑action model can improve dynamic manipulation performance without the computational cost of running the teacher at inference time."

By Siyuan Ma, Yutian Zhang, Boshi Zhang, Qinglian Wu, Jiaqi Zhai, Dong Wei, Xiaojin Huang
roboticsfine-tuningefficiencymultimodal
More like this →