arXiv:2606. 03184v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Financial forecasting is difficult due to low signal-to-noise ratios, latent factors, heavy tails, regime shifts, and jumps.
By Jiaze Sun, Kelvin J. L. Koa, Ruiyang Ni, Yize Liu, Haonan Chen, Ke-Wei Huang
arXiv:2608. 01599v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Volatility forecasts are commonly evaluated with aggregate accuracy metrics such as RMSE and MAE, but these metrics can hide conditional failures that matter for risk management.
By Arthur Chagas, Pedro Bento, Yan Aquino, Arthur Buzelin, Wagner Meira Jr., Cristiano Arbex Valle
arXiv:2606. 04164v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data samples used for training often differ from those encountered during fine-tuning and deployment, and while ML models show promise, their performance remains limited when only small annotated datasets are available.
By Sotirios Vavaroutas, Yu Yvonne Wu, Ali Etemad, Cecilia Mascolo
arXiv:2605. 30363v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Regime shifts in financial markets reorganise the joint dynamics of asset prices and macro variables, breaking any single-regime calibration.
By Mingxuan Yi, Vidal Mehra, Jing Chen, John Cartlidge
arXiv:2606. 07575v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Regulatory stress testing frameworks, including the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP), require robust Stressed Value-at-Risk (SVaR) estimation under forward-looking macroeconomic scenarios.
By Ujjwala Vadrevu
arXiv:2608. 12251v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Financial volatility is regime dependent, yet incorporating regime information into neural networks can also destabilize training.
By Junyi Ye, Gargi Vijay Borde