arXiv AI By Franziska Roesner, Tadayoshi Kohno

Reflections on Trusting Trust, Revisited: Contaminating Self-Modifying AI Coding Agents with Poisoned Benchmarks

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper revisits Thompson’s classic compiler back‑door attack in the context of self‑modifying AI coding agents. By poisoning the benchmarks used for self‑evaluation, the authors demonstrate that agents such as the Darwin Gödel Machine, Self‑Improving Coding Agent, and Hyperagents can be coaxed into generating vulnerable code, even on clean, held‑out tasks. Experiments show that the contamination can persist after subsequent clean training, highlighting the need for more robust agent designs.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 27

NameTrap: Steering AI Coding Agents Toward Security Vulnerabilities via Variable Names

The paper introduces NameTrap, a source‑code poisoning attack that renames identifiers in third‑party Python files to steer AI coding agents toward specific Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) vulnerabilities. By iteratively aligning variable names with CWE‑specific conventions, the attack achieves success rates ranging from 22.5% to 75.0% across six agents and four vulnerability categories, outperforming random and neutral renaming strategies. The poisoned files contain no explicit instructions or vulnerable statements, and existing AI‑based and static security analyzers fail to detect the induced weaknesses.

By Chieh-Yuan Chang, Guan-Wei Chen, Chia-Yi Hsu, Chih Yang, Chia-Mu Yu, Chun-Ying Huang