arXiv:2607. 20759v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI coding agents powered by LLMs are increasingly integrated into real-world software development, where they generate, edit, and execute code with autonomous access to local files and tools.
By Ankur Singh, Jinqiu Yang, Tse-Hsun Chen
arXiv:2608.30686v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Coding agents are increasingly used for software engineering tasks, including bootstrapping projects from third-party repositories whose integrity ca...
By Fukang Zhu, Binbin Zhao, Ruixiao Lin, Ping He, Tianyu Du, Shouling Ji
Coding agents are increasingly used for software engineering tasks, including bootstrapping projects from third-party repositories whose integrity cannot be assumed. Prior work on repository poisoning...
arXiv:2606. 18619v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The advent of agentic vulnerability detection is already becoming a watershed moment for software security.
By Zhengxiong Luo, Mehtab Zafar, Dylan Wolff, Abhik Roychoudhury
arXiv:2610.14350v2 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Having demonstrated a strong potential for automating vulnerability discovery, AI agents can also be used to attack software systems at scale. Today'...
By Jie Zhu, Ronik Bhaskar, Heather Zheng, Ben Y. Zhao, Kexin Pei
The paper revisits Thompson’s classic compiler back‑door attack in the context of self‑modifying AI coding agents. By poisoning the benchmarks used for self‑evaluation, the authors demonstrate that agents such as the Darwin Gödel Machine, Self‑Improving Coding Agent, and Hyperagents can be coaxed into generating vulnerable code, even on clean, held‑out tasks. Experiments show that the contamination can persist after subsequent clean training, highlighting the need for more robust agent designs.
By Franziska Roesner, Tadayoshi Kohno