Red-Teaming Large Language Models

Very Large Language Models and How to Evaluate Them

Understanding the capabilities, limitations, and societal impact of large language models

Evaluating large language models trained on code

Introducing The World's Largest Open Multilingual Language Model: BLOOM

The Curse of Multilinguality in Lexical Normalization

The paper investigates how many languages should be jointly trained in a single lexical normalization model. Using a fixed-capacity character-level model across twelve languages, it finds that accuracy peaks when a language is trained with only a few others—typically one to four—and then declines sharply as more languages are added, dropping about forty percent. A control experiment keeping total training data constant shows the decline is due to competition for model capacity rather than data scarcity, and no reliable typological rule predicts the optimal number of co‑training languages.

One Model to Translate Them All? A Journey to Mount Doom for Multilingual Model Merging

The paper investigates weight‑space merging of independently fine‑tuned multilingual machine translation models. Experiments show that merging is more successful when models share a target language, yet it still cannot match the peak performance of language‑specific checkpoints. When target languages differ, performance drops sharply, and analysis reveals that overlapping neuron activation and incompatible upper‑layer geometries cause these failures.