arXiv:2606. 24604v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Longitudinal modelling of Alzheimer's disease progression is clinically useful only if it can describe not just the most likely next diagnosis, but how a patient may evolve over time and how reliable that forecast is.
By Arya Hariharan, Shreyank N Gowda, Anala M R
Longitudinal modelling of Alzheimer's disease progression is clinically useful only if it can describe not just the most likely next diagnosis, but how a patient may evolve over time and how reliable that forecast is. Most deep learning approaches reduce this problem to single-step classification, treating cognitively normal, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia as flat categories while providing limited insight into how uncertainty accumulates across future visits.
arXiv:2606. 30398v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurately predicting the temporal evolution of clinical biomarkers is crucial for the early diagnosis and management of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease.
By Yujee Song, Seunghun Baek, Guorong Wu, Won Hwa Kim
arXiv:2607. 11656v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate diagnostic classification and disease-severity prediction for Alzheimer's disease are hampered by the incompleteness and heterogeneity of real-world clinical data.
By Christelle Schneuwly Diaz, Narmina Baghirova, Duy-Thanh Vu, Duy-Cat Can, Gilles Allali, Philippe Ryvlin, Oliver Y. Ch\'en
arXiv:2606. 02228v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predicting whether an individual with Alzheimer's disease will experience mild or severe disease progression is essential for personalized treatment.
By Clara Hoffmann, Nadja Klein
arXiv:2606. 09671v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression is highly heterogeneous and is typically observed through sparse and irregular longitudinal data, posing challenges for prediction and personalised monitoring.
By Yinyu Huang, Yilin Zhang, Sofia Michopoulou, Christopher Kipps, Rahman Attar