arXiv Machine Learning By Amruta Parulekar, Jinu Lee, Dilek Hakkani-T\"ur, Hari Sundaram

Reasoning Consensus: Structural Ensembling of LLM Reasoning via Weighted DAG Aggregation

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 27783v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) explore problems through chain-of-thought, but this exploration is buried in unstructured prose.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Sep 1

Scoring, Reasoning, and Selecting the Best! Ensembling Large Language Models via a Peer-Review Process

The paper introduces LLM‑PeerReview, an unsupervised ensemble method that selects the best response from multiple LLM-generated candidates by scoring each answer with several LLMs, aggregating those scores via averaging or a graphical model, and choosing the highest-scoring response. The approach is peer‑review inspired, transparent, and interpretable, and it outperforms the Smoothie‑Global model by 6.9%–7.3% across factual recall QA, math reasoning, and instruction‑following tasks. The authors also provide a curated benchmark suite of 12 ensemble methods evaluated on four datasets and three task families to aid reproducibility.

By Zhijun Chen, Zeyu Ji, Qianren Mao, Hao Wu, Jinhuan Song, Junhang Cheng, Bangjie Qin, Zhuoran Li, Jingzheng Li, Kai Sun, Zizhe Wang, Yikun Ban, Zhu Sun, Xiangyang Ji, Hailong Sun, Xiao Huang