arXiv:2607. 20871v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scaling semiconductor quantum dot arrays toward fault-tolerant quantum computing requires efficient tuneup of spin qubits, a process that depends on the analysis of charge stability maps (CSMs) and remains largely manual.
By Hyma Vallabhapurapu, Marco Candido, Krishna Choudhary, Paul Steinacker, Ensar Vahapoglu, Chris Escott, Wee Han Lim, Andre Saraiva, Nard Dumoulin Stuyck, MengKe Feng
The paper investigates how postprocessing routines in quantum neural network software can cause significant data loss when run on large quantum hardware. In a case study of Qiskit’s “SamplerQNN”, a filter that assumes measurement bit‑strings are in virtual qubit space removed 85–99.6% of valid shots on IBM backends, leading to unnormalised probability vectors and distorted predictions. This loss caused inference accuracy to drop from 0.94 to 0.39 and compressed training loss signals by 22–27×, severely reducing optimizer sensitivity. The authors implemented a layout‑based marginalisation fix that was merged into the library to make “SamplerQNN” forward‑compatible with current and future hardware.
By Soraya V. Panambalom, Edoardo Altamura, Nick Chancellor, Jonte R. Hance
The paper compares classical and hybrid quantum machine learning models for a trigger-like binary classification task using CMS open data. Eight classical models (SVM, ANN, CNN, LSTM) and eight quantum counterparts are evaluated under identical preprocessing, data splits, and decision thresholds, with performance measured by accuracy, ROC‑AUC, F1‑score, precision, and recall. The best classical model is an artificial neural network (93.53 % accuracy, 0.9819 ROC‑AUC), while the best quantum model is a quantum convolutional network (90.89 % accuracy, 0.9731 ROC‑AUC), indicating that within an eight‑qubit budget the quantum models do not surpass the classical ones.
By Tariq Mahmood, Muhammad Awais Rafique, Talab Hussain, Juan Pablo Perez Aguilar, Alfredo Raya, Muhammad Ahsan
The paper investigates how postprocessing routines in quantum neural network software can inadvertently discard a large portion of valid measurement data when run on real quantum hardware. In a case study of Qiskit’s “SamplerQNN”, a filter that assumes virtual qubit space caused 85–99.6% of measurement shots to be lost on IBM backends, leading to unnormalised probability vectors, degraded inference accuracy (from 0.94 to 0.39), and a 22–27× compression of the training loss signal. The authors provide a layout‑based marginalisation fix that has been merged into the library to ensure forward‑compatibility with current and future hardware.
arXiv:2607. 08928v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This work presents a study of an implementation of a novel Quantum Convolutional Neural Network (QCNN) for binary classification of images from the Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST) dataset.
By Lawrence Nguyen, Hiu Yung Wong
arXiv:2607. 20302v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms in high energy physics (HEP) can efficiently represent and leverage long-range, high-order correlations in high-dimensional collider data, potentially with fewer parameters and favorable scaling relative to classical models.
By Ivan Ge, Sagar Addepalli, Abhilasha Dave, Julia Gonski