arXiv:2606. 10794v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Existing black-box LLM provenance methods achieve comparability by querying every candidate model with the same diagnostic prompts.
By Jiaxu Liu, Sunnan Mu, Dong Huang, Liuyin Wang, Jing Shao, Jie Zhang
arXiv:2606. 00016v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Detecting AI-generated text is becoming increasingly challenging as modern language models approach human-level fluency and can evade detectors that rely on surface statistics or likelihood-based signals.
By Aria Nourbakhsh, Adelaide Danilov, Christoph Schommer, Salima Lamsiyah
arXiv:2604. 01904v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Post-hoc unauthorized-training data detection for large language models (LLMs) typically assumes a query-with-originals regime: rights holders query a target LLM with raw proprietary data and assess whether the model assigns them stronger memorization-based detection signals, e.
By Muxing Li, Zesheng Ye, Sharon Li, Feng Liu
arXiv:2609.06771v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Authorship signals matter in settings where writing style carries identity: digital forensics, plagiarism analysis, account linking, misinformation i...
By MaoXun Huang, Zhenxing Zhang, Claire Cardie
arXiv:2606. 07524v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The explosive growth of large language models (LLMs) has created a heterogeneous and poorly documented ecosystem, making systematic model comparison increasingly important for provenance auditing, security analysis, and model selection.
By Zirui Wang, Yusen Hou, Shaofeng Liang, Bowen Tian, Yanlin Zhang, Wenshuo Chen, Yutao Yue
arXiv:2608. 19746v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personalized text generation aims to make LLMs write in a specific individual's style, yet existing benchmarks measure task accuracy or preference alignment rather than whether the model's output actually resembles the target author's writing.
By Yash Ganpat Sawant