arXiv:2512. 19458v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in agentic frameworks for scientific discovery.
By Zeyu Xia, Jinzhe Ma, Congjie Zheng, Zhongyao Wang, Shufei Zhang, Yuqiang Li, Hang Su, P. Hu, Changshui Zhang, Xingao Gong, Wanli Ouyang, Lei Bai, Dongzhan Zhou, Mao Su
arXiv:2606. 19152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Identifying the lowest-energy surface-adsorbate configuration is critical for modeling heterogeneous catalysis, yet exhaustive exploration with ab initio calculations is computationally prohibitive.
By Zongmin Zhang, Yuyang Lou, Bowen Zhang, Junwu Chen, Ryo Kuroki, Xuan Vu Nguyen, Edvin Fako, Lixue Cheng, Philippe Schwaller
arXiv:2607. 10559v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) offer a highly modular platform for adsorptive gas separation, yet their vast reticular design space makes inverse design difficult under simultaneous constraints of chemical validity, separation performance, and structural diversity.
By Zhaolin Hu, Hehe Fan, Wangyihan Guo, Meng Xu, Chenhao Rao, Qiwei Yang, Yi Yang
Identifying the lowest-energy surface-adsorbate configuration is critical for modeling heterogeneous catalysis, yet exhaustive exploration with ab initio calculations is computationally prohibitive. Machine-learning force fields (MLFFs) accelerate structural relaxation but leave the search over the vast configurational space a major bottleneck, and open-loop large language model (LLM) agents lack a physics-grounded feedback mechanism to correct erroneous initial guesses.
The study examined sixteen independent runs of a single autonomous materials discovery model, each given the same database of 12,499 metal‑organic frameworks and tasked with optimizing methane storage. The agents’ strategies varied widely, screening between 100 and 5,000 structures and constructing 2,253 hypothetical frameworks, yet all converged on the same high‑performance materials frontier near 200 cm³ cm⁻³. Even when half the agents were subjected to stricter checks, the overall conclusions remained unchanged, revealing both robust findings and a shared error stemming from an incomplete database entry.
By Jihan Kim
CompMat-Bench is a new benchmark comprising 94 tasks drawn from recent computational materials science studies, designed to evaluate AI agents on realistic research steps without requiring costly simulations during testing. The benchmark pre‑reproduces inputs and outputs to provide ground truth, allowing agents to be graded with fixed rules rather than an LLM judge. It supports both single tasks and multi‑step workflows, with varying levels of methodological guidance, and shows that while agents can achieve high pass rates on individual tasks, performance drops in longer workflows or with reduced guidance, often due to scientific rather than software errors.
By Chenmu Zhang, Levi Felix, Jun-Jie Zhang, Xingfu Li, Xuelian Jiang, Tao Jiang, Subhendu Mishra, Xixi Qin, Boris Yakobson