arXiv Machine Learning By Mariya Pavlova, Harrison Bo Hua Zhu, Elizsveta Semenova, Yingzhen Li

Quantizing Time-Series Models As Dynamical Systems: Trajectory-Based Quantization Sensitivity Score

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 13300v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce the Trajectory-based Quantization Sensitivity Score (TQS), a metric that reframes post-training quantization (PTQ) through the lens of dynamical-systems stability.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

Q-PACE: Dynamic Precision Allocation for Quantization-Aware Training

Q-PACE is a dynamic precision allocation method for quantization-aware training that uses a second-order sensitivity model to predict loss increases from quantization noise. By periodically recalculating per-layer curvature coefficients and reassigning precision, it improves mixed-precision training for large language models up to 4 B parameters, achieving comparable loss with lower memory usage. The approach shows that quantization sensitivity is predictable by depth and layer type, enabling infrequent, inexpensive recalibration.

By Alexandra Volkova, Matin Ansaripour, Erik Schultheis, Christoph H. Lampert, Dan Alistarh
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 10

Closing the Null Space: Guidance-Aware Quantization for Classifier-Free Diffusion

arXiv:2607. 08241v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deploying classifier-free guidance (CFG) diffusion models under real-world compute budgets requires quantization, yet existing post-training quantization (PTQ) methods treat CFG models as single-branch networks, ignoring the paired conditional/unconditional structure that CFG inference fundamentally relies on.

By Abdullah Al Shafi, Sumaiya Rahim Suma
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1

A Target-Centric Survey of Quantization-Aware Training

The paper presents a target‑centric survey of Quantization‑Aware Training (QAT), a technique that simulates quantization during model training to produce low‑bit models with accuracy comparable to full‑precision ones. It systematically reviews existing QAT methods using a target‑centric taxonomy, highlighting differences in error characteristics, numerical formats, and strategy transferability across targets. The survey also summarizes QAT evaluation paradigms, discusses optimization and deployment challenges, and outlines potential future research directions.

By Jiamin Song, Mengjie Zhao, Zijing Wang, Yongkang Liu, Qian Li, Shi Feng, Feiliang Ren, Daling Wang, Hinrich Sch\"utze