arXiv Machine Learning By Weiyuan Gong, Hong-Ye Hu

Provably Efficient Self-Calibrating Quantum Fault Tolerance

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2608. 05686v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum error correction protects logical information only when every physical operation remains below the fault-tolerance threshold, a condition that must be maintained continuously rather than only at the initial calibration.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Sep 1

Reverse N-Wise Output-Oriented Testing for AI/ML and Quantum Computing Systems

The paper proposes reverse n‑wise output‑oriented testing for AI/ML and quantum computing systems, a method that builds covering arrays over output equivalence classes, confidence buckets, decision boundaries, fairness partitions, embedding clusters, ranking stability bands, quantum measurement distributions, and error syndrome patterns. It then uses gradient‑free metaheuristic optimization to solve the inverse mapping problem, generating input configurations or quantum circuit parameters that trigger specific behavioral signatures in opaque models. The framework claims to provide explicit coverage guarantees, higher fault detection rates for calibration, boundary, and error syndromes, improved test suite efficiency, and automated partition discovery for MLOps and quantum validation pipelines.

By Lamine Rihani
arXiv AI
Sep 17

Securing quantum error correction against misleading advice from AI agents

The paper investigates how an attacker could manipulate an AI adviser to issue harmful quantum error‑correction updates. It identifies an ambiguity in passive syndrome records that can mislead recovery selection and demonstrates that additional calibration measurements can provide the missing sign information needed for safe updates. By introducing a separate evaluator that only accepts updates when calibration uncertainty and drift bounds certify improvement, the authors show through simulations and surface‑code experiments that harmful proposals are rejected while beneficial ones are retained.

By A. Bar{\i}\c{s} \"Ozg\"uler
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

Repairability of Inexact Solvers in Recursive State Estimation with Machine Learning

The paper investigates how approximate numerical solvers used in recursive state estimation can be repaired using bounded corrections, characterizing when such corrections meet local admissibility tolerances and how they influence finite‑horizon covariance. It derives error identities that separate solve error from gain drift, revealing quartic and sixth‑order contributions to the covariance response. The framework is applied to a power‑grid tolerance study, showing that learned corrections reduce the required conjugate‑gradient iterations, and it demonstrates a unified interface for classical, quantum, and hybrid solvers.

By Yanjun Ji, Dennis Willsch, Orkun \c{S}ensebat, Priyanka Arkalgud Ganeshamurthy, Zhi Pei, M. Sahnawaz Alam, Ivelina Stoyanova, Frank K. Wilhelm, Bo Zhao, Chao Wang, Kristel Michielsen