arXiv Computer Vision By Chang Dong, Mehdi Hosseinzadeh, King Hang Wong, Lingqiao Liu, Francois Fraysse, Feras Dayoub, Minh Hoai Nguyen

ProTracer: Proprioception-Guided Failure Diagnosis in Robot Manipulation

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

ProTracer is a training‑free framework that uses Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) together with proprioceptive signals to analyze robot manipulation failures. It performs binary failure detection, categorization, explanation generation, and introduces failure onset localization—identifying the earliest moment a robot deviates from a valid trajectory leading to failure. The method leverages proprioceptive dynamics to pinpoint informative action boundaries and converts robot‑state signals into natural‑language descriptions for joint multimodal reasoning, achieving strong performance on both conventional failure diagnosis and the new failure onset localization task.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 7

FailureSpot: Label-Efficient Timestamp-Level Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models

The paper introduces FailureSpot, a label‑efficient method for detecting failures at the timestamp level in vision‑language‑action (VLA) policies. It first generates weak supervision from unlabeled VLA action chunks by identifying abnormal patterns, then employs active learning to annotate only the most uncertain trajectories. Experiments on multiple VLA policies demonstrate improved performance for both timestamp‑level and trajectory‑level failure detection.

By Jie Ma, Zongxi Liu, Yi Zhu
arXiv AI
Sep 4

FailBench: How Reliable are VLMs at Judging Robot Task Success?

FailBench is a new benchmark for robot failure detection, containing 2,197 manipulation attempts from 14 public sources, with 75% of failures occurring naturally. The study evaluates 13 vision‑language model (VLM) detectors, finding the best model achieves only 0.77 mean balanced accuracy, and that fine‑tuned failure detectors often underperform general‑purpose VLMs. Performance varies with visual evidence, excelling when object motion is observable but dropping to near chance on contact‑intensive assembly tasks, and input‑level cropping of outcome‑relevant regions improves the top detector by 2.4 percentage points.

By Zaruhi Navasardyan, Tatul Danielyan, Hrant Davtyan
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 28

TrapVLA: Trapping Vision-Language-Action Models in Configured Failure Modes

The paper introduces Configured Failure Trapping, a new backdoor attack targeting Vision‑Language‑Action (VLA) models that activates through subtle textual triggers and forces the robot to fail in a specific, controlled manner. It presents a data engine for generating high‑quality target trajectories, an automated evaluation suite, and two benchmarks—Trap‑LIBERO and Trap‑RoboTwin—covering four failure modes. The authors propose TrapVLA, a method that learns trigger‑induced action residuals to steer policies toward the desired failure behavior, demonstrating effectiveness in both simulation and real‑world robotic experiments while maintaining performance on clean data.

By Jun-Hui Liu, Kun-Yu Lin, Yi-Lin Wei, Xu-Han Chen, Yinghao Li, Zhuohao Li, Yuan-Ming Li, Qing Zhang, Xiaoyi Fan, Dongmei Jiang, Yan Li, Wei-Shi Zheng
arXiv AI
Jun 9

Benchmarking Vision-Language-Action Models on SO-101: Failure and Recovery Analysis

arXiv:2606. 08881v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong generalization in robotic manipulation, yet existing evaluations are primarily conducted in simulation or on expensive robotic platforms, leaving their robustness on affordable real-world robots largely unexplored.

By Yi Yu, Xinchuan Qiu