The paper introduces Hide-and-Seek, a framework for detecting failures in Vision‑Language‑Action (VLA) models during robot execution. It treats failure detection as a coarsely supervised learning problem, using inter‑trajectory and intra‑trajectory contrastive objectives to localize failure‑indicative actions without step‑level annotations. Experiments on LIBERO, VLABench, and a real‑world robotic platform show that Hide‑and‑Seek achieves state‑of‑the‑art multi‑task failure detection performance across several VLA policies.
By Seongheon Park, Wendi Li, Changdae Oh, Samuel Yeh, Zsolt Kira, Michael Hagenow, Sharon Li
VLA-FAIL introduces a lightweight framework for detecting failures in vision-language-action models used in robotic manipulation. It combines two novel detectors: the first-layer Mahalanobis distance (LLMD) identifies out-of-distribution states by comparing token-wise deviations in last-layer features to training data, while the second, action chunk consistency (ACC), detects failures by spotting inconsistencies between consecutive action chunks in receding-horizon control. The authors also propose a threshold‑independent metric, “AUCPDT,” to evaluate detection accuracy and latency, and show through real‑world and simulation experiments that LLMD and ACC together provide reliable and early failure detection, outperforming more expensive baseline methods.
By Florian Seligmann, Emiliyan Gospodinov, Enes Ulas Dincer, Gerhard Neumann
The paper introduces VLA‑Tug, a lightweight probe that monitors latent layers of Vision‑Language‑Action models to detect failures early and predict failure modes. By supervising on pre‑failure segments, it improves early detection by up to 30% at matched false‑positive rates and maintains valid missed‑detection and false‑alarm bounds in 86% of runs under unseen task shifts, outperforming existing baselines. The method also raises top‑3 accuracy on unseen tasks by up to 44% and supports real‑time, edge‑efficient monitoring for safer deployment.
By Michal P. Podolinsky, Yunhao Yang, Daniel Little, Hong Lu, Rohan Siva, Olin Goudey, Neel P. Bhatt, Matthias Scheutz, Ufuk Topcu
The paper introduces Configured Failure Trapping, a new backdoor attack targeting Vision‑Language‑Action (VLA) models that activates through subtle textual triggers and forces the robot to fail in a specific, controlled manner. It presents a data engine for generating high‑quality target trajectories, an automated evaluation suite, and two benchmarks—Trap‑LIBERO and Trap‑RoboTwin—covering four failure modes. The authors propose TrapVLA, a method that learns trigger‑induced action residuals to steer policies toward the desired failure behavior, demonstrating effectiveness in both simulation and real‑world robotic experiments while maintaining performance on clean data.
By Jun-Hui Liu, Kun-Yu Lin, Yi-Lin Wei, Xu-Han Chen, Yinghao Li, Zhuohao Li, Yuan-Ming Li, Qing Zhang, Xiaoyi Fan, Dongmei Jiang, Yan Li, Wei-Shi Zheng
ProTracer is a training‑free framework that uses Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) together with proprioceptive signals to analyze robot manipulation failures. It performs binary failure detection, categorization, explanation generation, and introduces failure onset localization—identifying the earliest moment a robot deviates from a valid trajectory leading to failure. The method leverages proprioceptive dynamics to pinpoint informative action boundaries and converts robot‑state signals into natural‑language descriptions for joint multimodal reasoning, achieving strong performance on both conventional failure diagnosis and the new failure onset localization task.
By Chang Dong, Mehdi Hosseinzadeh, King Hang Wong, Lingqiao Liu, Francois Fraysse, Feras Dayoub, Minh Hoai Nguyen
arXiv:2512.01946v4 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Robust robotic manipulation requires reliable failure detection and recovery. Although recent Vision-Language Models (VLMs) show promise in r...
By Paul Pacaud, Ricardo Garcia, Shizhe Chen, Cordelia Schmid
arXiv:2606. 08508v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative robot policies fail unpredictably at deployment: they hesitate at critical moments, drift off-task, or commit to unrecoverable actions.
By Bingjia Huang, Xiangyu Li, Xiang Wang, Liang Mi, Zixu Hao, Weijun Wang, Hao Wu, Kun Li, Yunxin Liu, Ting Cao
VLA-Scope is a two‑stage framework designed to predict failures in vision‑language‑action models under distribution shifts. The first stage detects out‑of‑distribution inputs and classifies their shift categories using pooled image and language representations. For OOD inputs, the second stage updates failure risk during execution by combining shift category, action‑prefix features, and execution progress, achieving a ROC‑AUC of 0.8497 after 60 actions and outperforming baseline methods.
By Kaiwen Zhu, Dongfang Liu, Liangkai Liu
RePO‑VLA is a recovery‑driven policy optimization framework for Vision‑Language‑Action models that separates success, recovery, and failure trajectories. It introduces Recovery‑Aware Initialization, a Progress‑Aware Semantic Value Function, and Value‑Conditioned Refinement to learn from both successful and failed rollouts, enabling the policy to prefer high‑progress actions without online failure detectors. The authors also present the Failure‑Recovery Benchmark (FRBench) and demonstrate that RePO‑VLA raises adversarial success rates from 20% to 75% on average in simulated and real‑world bimanual tasks.
By Weijia Liufu, Xiaoyu Guo, Ruiyi Chen, Jingzhi Liu, Kaidong Zhang, Xiwen Liang, Jianqi Lin, Dawei Sun, Yuze Wang, Rongtao Xu, Bingqian Lin, Bowen Yang, Tongtong Cao, Bowen Peng, Dongyu Zhang, Guangrun Wang, Min Wang, Liang Lin, Xiaodan Liang
The paper introduces an event‑grounded interpretability pipeline for Vision‑Language‑Action (VLA) policies, using sparse autoencoders (SAEs) whose feature analysis is anchored to behavioral events rather than textual context. Keyframes are extracted from end‑effector trajectories and clustered with visual, robot‑state, and temporal cues, guiding SAE feature ranking and optionally enriched with vision‑language‑model (VLM) annotations. Experiments on two simulation architectures and a real‑robot study show that event‑grounded ranking produces the strongest causal effects on OpenVLA and transfers to continuous action chunks of π_{0.5}, while also highlighting the limitations of SAE as an intervention basis.
By Xinchen Jin, Aditya Chatterjee, Pranav Kumar, Rohan Paleja
FailBench is a new benchmark for robot failure detection, containing 2,197 manipulation attempts from 14 public sources, with 75% of failures occurring naturally. The study evaluates 13 vision‑language model (VLM) detectors, finding the best model achieves only 0.77 mean balanced accuracy, and that fine‑tuned failure detectors often underperform general‑purpose VLMs. Performance varies with visual evidence, excelling when object motion is observable but dropping to near chance on contact‑intensive assembly tasks, and input‑level cropping of outcome‑relevant regions improves the top detector by 2.4 percentage points.
By Zaruhi Navasardyan, Tatul Danielyan, Hrant Davtyan
The paper introduces FailBank, a four‑stage self‑evolving framework that transforms runtime feedback from safety shields into lasting policy improvements for vision‑language‑action (VLA) models. By using a counterfactual correction teacher, outcome‑aware admission, and guarded LoRA updates, FailBank converts useful shield proposals into corrective targets while preserving successful actions as anchors. Experiments on the VLA‑Arena benchmark show that FailBank boosts task success rates by up to 8.5 percentage points and reduces cumulative policy cost by up to 35.6%, outperforming both base policies and traditional runtime shielding.
By Mingyue Cui, Zheyuan Liu, Yihan Zhu, Zheyuan Zhang, Meng Jiang