Hugging Face Trending Papers
ProPerAgent: Toward Memory-Driven Proactive Assistance
Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
Related stories
arXiv Computation and Language
1d ago
ProPerAgent: Toward Memory-Driven Proactive Assistance
arXiv:2610.22671v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As assistants move from reactive answering toward proactive intervention, memory changes role: it no longer only supplies the answer to a query, it det...
Hugging Face Trending Papers
5d ago
Memorizing Who, Knowing How: Benchmarking Personal and Procedural Memory for Persistent Assistants
Memory systems for persistent personal agents must move beyond isolated memories, maintaining both personal memory about whom they serve and procedural memory about how to act. Crucially, in harness-b...
arXiv AI
Jul 10
Remember When It Matters: Proactive Memory Agent for Long-Horizon Agents
arXiv:2607. 08716v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In long-horizon tasks, decision-relevant state is often scattered across an expanding trajectory, while the action agent must surface it and act.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 9
Remember When It Matters: Proactive Memory Agent for Long-Horizon Agents
In long-horizon tasks, decision-relevant state is often scattered across an expanding trajectory, while the action agent must surface it and act. As trajectories grow, task requirements, environment facts, prior attempts, diagnoses, and open subgoals can be buried in the context window or pushed beyond it, failing to influence decisions when needed.
arXiv AI
Jun 15
StreamMemBench: Streaming Evaluation of Agent Memory for Future-Oriented Assistance
arXiv:2606. 14571v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A central role of personal-agent memory is to turn stored information and prior interactions into future-oriented assistance.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
UTILMEM: Benchmarking Evidence Utilization in Long-Term Conversational Memory
UTILMEM is a new diagnostic benchmark that tests how conversational agents use long‑term memory, focusing on reasoning over dense histories, spotting implicitly relevant memories, synthesizing distributed evidence, and resisting interference from similar distractors. It contains 1,717 instances across five domains and evaluates a range of retrieval‑based and memory‑augmented systems. The study shows that strong performance on traditional factual recall does not guarantee effective memory utilization, highlighting a gap between retrieving information and integrating it into coherent, task‑oriented outputs.