arXiv:2607. 00510v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowing which training examples drive outputs is fundamental to auditing, correcting, and understanding language models, yet for modern LLMs this remains expensive, approximate, and largely post-hoc.
By Dan Ley, Giang Nguyen, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Julius Adebayo
arXiv:2608. 03071v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model agents derive much of their capability from tool use.
By Guoyao Yu, Xiaoqing Sun, Ziqi Huang, Shaojing Fan, Zhongyi Zhang, Xiaomeng Hu, Xiaobo Xue, Yangyang Shi, Xiong Xiao, Yang Song, Biao Lyu, Rong Wen, Xing Li, Qinming He, Shunming Zhu, Zhenguang Liu
arXiv:2607. 19604v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Injecting factual knowledge into large language models (LLMs) reliably and at scale remains an open challenge.
By Nischay Dhankhar, Dos Baha, Abulhair Saparov
arXiv:2606. 07616v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scaling laws provide a fundamental framework for understanding the performance of Language Models (LMs), yet deriving them requires prohibitively expensive evaluations across thousands of checkpoints or millions of inference samples.
By Sang Truong, Yuheng Tu, Rylan Schaeffer, Sanmi Koyejo
arXiv:2607. 28008v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Representation engineering reads and steers capability directions in large language models, yet methods are typically evaluated on paper-specific synthetic data.
By Yanshi Li, Xueru Bai, Shuman Liu, Long Zhang
arXiv:2606. 17945v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models provide a tractable system for asking how intelligence itself emerges, rather than only how LLMs can be engineered.
By Liangkai Hang, Junjie Yao, Zhiyu Li, Feiyu Xiong, Hongkang Yang, Zhi-Qin John Xu