arXiv AI By Sourav Das

ProbeScale: Probing Analysis to Optimize Neural Scaling Laws for Efficient Small Language Model Inference

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 01806v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Small Language Models (SLMs) offer a balance between capability and computational feasibility.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 2

Prototype Language Models

arXiv:2607. 00510v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowing which training examples drive outputs is fundamental to auditing, correcting, and understanding language models, yet for modern LLMs this remains expensive, approximate, and largely post-hoc.

By Dan Ley, Giang Nguyen, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Julius Adebayo
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4

SuperValid: Capability-Aligned OOD Validation for Generalizable Downstream Scaling

The paper introduces SuperValid, a framework that generates out-of-distribution, capability-aligned validation data by distilling core concepts from benchmarks and expanding them into diverse, knowledge-rich texts. By focusing on capability-level performance rather than benchmark-specific metrics, SuperValid’s loss correlates strongly and stably with downstream benchmark results across a wide range of models, scales, and training data distributions. This training‑free metric can be computed during training, enabling model selection, early stopping, and scaling decisions without the need for benchmark evaluation.

By Quanen Sun, Changxin Tian, Ke Shi, Cai Chen, Cunyin Peng, Jia Liu, Kunlong Chen, Zhiqiang Zhang, Jun Zhou
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

Negligible in Size, Significant in Effect: On Scale Vectors in Large Language Models

The paper investigates the often-overlooked scale vectors in large language models, showing that despite their tiny size they are crucial for pre‑training performance. The authors provide theoretical insights that scale vectors mainly aid optimization rather than expressivity, and they analyze how weight decay affects different normalization layers. Building on these findings, they propose lightweight improvements—branch‑specific heterogeneity, better placement, and magnitude‑direction reparameterization—that consistently reduce loss across a range of model sizes and training settings.

By Mingze Wang, Shuchen Zhu, Yuxin Fang, Binghui Li, Kai Shen, Shu Zhong