arXiv Machine Learning
Probabilistic Modelling of Operational Design Domains, A New Approach for Testing AI Systems
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 17
Reasoning-supported Robustness Validation of Automotive E/E Components
This paper presents an ontology-supported approach to tackle the complexity of the Robustness Validation (RV) process of automotive electrical/electronic (E/E) components. The approach uses formalized...
arXiv AI
Aug 18
Reasoning-supported Robustness Validation of Automotive E/E Components
arXiv:2608. 16421v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents an ontology-supported approach to tackle the complexity of the Robustness Validation (RV) process of automotive electrical/electronic (E/E) components.
arXiv AI
Aug 24
Coverage-Driven Verification for Safety-by-Design in AI-Based Collision Avoidance Systems
The paper proposes a structured method for assessing the representativeness of Operational Design Domains (ODDs) in AI/ML-based aviation systems, focusing on safety assurance. It outlines a process flow from ODD definition to quantitative evaluation, recommending Kullback–Leibler divergence and Cramér’s V over chi‑squared tests for large datasets. The approach is illustrated with AI-based collision avoidance simulations, demonstrating how statistical distribution comparisons can support safety‑by‑design engineering aligned with EASA guidance.
arXiv AI
Jul 1
Scenario Generation for Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems Using Real-World Failure Records
arXiv:2606. 31131v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: To ensure safe on-road behavior, pre-deployment testing and failure discovery of Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS) is crucial.
arXiv AI
Sep 3
From High-Dimensional Spaces to Verifiable ODD Coverage for Safety-Critical AI-based Systems
The paper proposes a structured method for verifying Operational Design Domain (ODD) coverage in safety‑critical AI systems, particularly for aviation. It combines parameter discretization, constraint‑based filtering, and criticality‑based dimension reduction to create a multi‑step verification process. Using simulation data from AI‑based mid‑air collision avoidance research, the authors demonstrate how this approach can meet EASA’s requirement for complete ODD coverage in high‑dimensional spaces.
arXiv AI
2d ago
Ontology-Based Contextual AI Evaluations (OB-CAIE) Methodology
The Ontology-Based Contextual AI Evaluations (OB-CAIE) methodology introduces a structured approach to AI evaluation by defining clear testing coverage and balancing human expertise with automation. It employs two ontologies—the Domain‑Specific Ontology (DSO) outlining what is tested, and the Evaluation Process Ontology (EPO) detailing how it is tested—to create a tractable problem space that can be applied to single or multiple AI evaluations. OB‑CAIE enables traceable, visualizable failure points and incorporates human judgment at scientifically grounded junctures where machine input is insufficient.