arXiv:2607. 18029v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers need to answer ad-hoc questions about the contents of domain-specific archives but often lack the expertise to write structured queries on the metadata.
By Blake G. Fitch, Cato Elia Kurtz
arXiv:2607. 14494v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Complex knowledge base question answering (KBQA) is commonly approached through either information retrieval over a question-specific subgraph or semantic parsing into an executable logical form.
By Yiming Zhang, Koji Tsuda
The paper introduces EXYGEN, a framework that enables conversational access to large knowledge graphs by combining VoID descriptions, ShEx schemas, retrieved triples, and example question‑query pairs in a retrieval‑augmented generation pipeline. On the SciQA benchmark, this approach achieves an exact‑match score of 0.419 without fine‑tuning any large language model, and shows that larger general‑purpose LLMs can outperform smaller code‑specialized ones when provided sufficient context. To scale metadata generation for very large KGs, the authors propose a predicate‑coverage‑aware parallel graph sampling strategy that preserves structural diversity, reduces runtime by over 80× on OpenCitations Meta and GESIS, and is the only tractable method for obtaining complete metadata on ORKG.
By Harshdeep Singh, Yurui Zhu, Giovanni Colavizza, Matteo Romanello
arXiv:2602. 11745v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Graph models are fundamental to data analysis in domains rich with complex relationships.
By Songlin Lyu, Lujie Ban, Zihang Wu, Tianqi Luo, Jirong Liu, Ayoub Moussaid, Oskar van Rest, Heng Lin, Chenhao Ma, Nan Tang, Shipeng Qi, Yongchao Liu, Zhan Qiu, Juelu Zhang, Jiajun Zheng
arXiv:2608. 06331v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: From natural-language query interfaces to automated report generation, data analysis tools need a description of the data: the real-world entities it contains, which columns function as measures or identifiers, and how tables connect into units of analysis.
By Donna Hooshmand, Shubham Shahi, Cameron Barrie, Abhratanu Dutta, Marko Sterbentz, Harper Pack, Kristian J. Hammond
arXiv:2606. 28601v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent progress in Text-to-SQL has been driven by stronger language models and prompting strategies, yet performance on real enterprise benchmarks such as Spider 2.
By Jingwen Liu, Weibin Liao, Xin Gao, Junfeng Zhao, Yasha Wang
arXiv:2508. 01815v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Text-to-SPARQL maps natural-language questions to executable SPARQL queries over RDF knowledge graphs.
By Yang Zhao, Chengxiao Dai, Yue Xiu, Dusit Niyato
arXiv:2507. 21438v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Ontologies and knowledge graphs require continuous evolution to remain comprehensive and accurate, but manual curation is labor intensive.
By Vishal Raman, Vijai Aravindh R, Abhijith Ragav
arXiv:2606. 03705v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are widely used to mitigate the limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as outdated knowledge and hallucinations.
By Weiwei Ding, Zixuan Li, Long Bai, Zhuo Chen, Kun Su, Fei Wang, Xiaolong Jin, Jin Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Xueqi Cheng
arXiv:2607. 17269v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models encode world models implicitly in neural weights, which exposes four structural risks in high-precision domains such as medicine and finance: hallucination, frozen knowledge, poor explainability, and poor modifiability.
By Zhanbo Li, Shifeng Wu, Xiangjin Meng, Wenjie Cai
The pro-team at LLMs4OL 2026 presented a system for ontology learning that tackles both the End-to-End Flagship Task (Task A) and the Ontology Extension Reuse Task (Task B). Their approach uses an offline retrieval‑augmented few‑shot prompting pipeline with Qwen2.5‑14B‑Instruct and MiniLM‑L6‑v2 for retrieval, selecting top‑5 examples for Task A and top‑2 for Task B, and applies a left‑truncated context‑windowing strategy to keep task instructions in long prompts. For Task B, generated triples are filtered deterministically by a vocabulary constraint, keeping triples that involve at least one term from the closed vocabulary and removing duplicates of the initial ontology, achieving high scores in Semantic Graph Similarity, Term‑Typing F1, and Taxonomy Discovery F1, though no non‑taxonomic relations were extracted.
By Shivam Mishra, Dhannu Ram Meena, Muneendra Ojha, Krishna Pratap Singh, Kuldeep Singh
arXiv:2608. 14228v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Life science knowledge graphs make large collections of structured data available through SPARQL, but each resource uses its own schema, identifiers, and links.
By Yiming Zhang, Koji Tsuda