arXiv Computation and Language By Sneha Oram, Tejomay Kishor Padole, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Suyash P. Awate

PRiME: Pragmatic Reasoning In MEntal health

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper PRiME investigates how large language models (LLMs) can perform pragmatic reasoning in the mental health domain. It introduces three datasets and tasks, evaluates 12 LLMs—including the specialized MentaLLaMA model—and finds that performance is comparable to human evaluation, with Mistral‑7B achieving the best results. The study also examines error asymmetry and uses first‑order attention rollout to analyze MentaLLaMA‑7B’s architectural behavior, urging careful analysis for high‑stakes applications.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
1d ago

Beyond Empathy: Integrating Diagnostic and Therapeutic Reasoning with Large Language Models for Mental Health Counseling

The paper introduces PsyLLM, a large language model specifically designed for mental health counseling that integrates diagnostic reasoning and multiple therapeutic frameworks. It employs an automated data synthesis pipeline that transforms Reddit mental‑health posts into multi‑turn counseling dialogues, guided by DSM/ICD standards and therapies such as CBT, ACT, and psychodynamic approaches. A new benchmark and evaluation protocol show that PsyLLM outperforms baseline models, with results validated by professional counseling experts.

By He Hu, Juzheng Si, Qianning Wang, Fei Ma, Fuji Ren, Sicheng Zhao, Yucheng Zhou, Laizhong Cui
arXiv AI
1d ago

Cognitive Foundations for Reasoning and Their Manifestation in LLMs

The paper presents a taxonomy of 28 cognitive elements derived from cognitive science to analyze reasoning in large language models (LLMs). Using a fine‑grained evaluation framework, the authors compare 192,000 model traces with 1,346 human think‑aloud traces, finding that while models deploy similar cognitive elements, they differ in usage patterns. The study introduces test‑time reasoning guidance that improves model accuracy on ill‑structured problems by 9.7 percentage points and highlights a research gap in self‑awareness, advocating for a shared vocabulary to diagnose failures and guide robust model development.

By Shuyue Stella Li, Priyanka Kargupta, Haocheng Wang, Jinu Lee, Dean Light, Shan Chen, Orevaoghene Ahia, Thomas L. Griffiths, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Jiawei Han, Asli Celikyilmaz, Yulia Tsvetkov
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 16

MindEval2: Clinically Grounded Patients and Rubrics for Evaluating Language Models in Mental Health Support

MindEval2 is a new evaluation framework for AI chatbots in mental health support, comprising Mental Health Quality Rubrics (MHQR) and the MindSim patient simulation harness. MHQR, developed with PhD-level psychologists, provides explicit, actionable criteria for assessing response quality, while MindSim offers realistic, longitudinal patient interactions with a memory component. The study evaluated 18 models, finding that although surface-level quality has improved, guidance calibration remains the main failure across all models.

By John Mendon\c{c}a, Daniel Tschernutter, Jos\'e Pombal, Areti Vassilopoulos, Catarina Botelho, Ignacio Sarasua, Maya D'Eon, Nuno Guerreiro, Ricardo Rei
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 16

Enhancing Accessibility of Medical Texts through Large Language Model-Driven Plain Language Adaptation

The paper explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4o-mini, Gemini-1.5-pro, and LLaMA can be used to automatically simplify complex medical texts into plain language, a process known as Plain Language Adaptation (PLA). It evaluates different prompting strategies, fine‑tunes models with QLoRA, and incorporates Mixture‑of‑Agents (MoA) techniques to improve adaptability and robustness. The results show that LLM‑driven PLA effectively makes healthcare information more comprehensible while preserving essential content.

By Ting-Wei Chang, Hen-Hsen Huang, Hsin-Hsi Chen