arXiv AI By Xiaobin Li, Kai Wu, Yujian Betterest Li, Xiaoyu Zhang, Handing Wang, Jing Liu

Pretrained Optimization Model for Zero-Shot Black Box Optimization

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2405. 03728v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Zero-shot optimization involves optimizing a target task that was not seen during training, aiming to provide the optimal solution without or with minimal adjustments to the optimizer.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Wiggle and Go! System Identification for Zero-Shot Dynamic Rope Manipulation

Wiggle and Go! is a two‑stage framework for zero‑shot rope manipulation that first performs a brief, safe wiggle action to infer rope parameters, then uses those parameters to condition a trajectory optimizer for goal‑conditioned execution. The method achieves 3.55 cm average accuracy on 3D target striking in real‑world tests, far outperforming uninformed baselines, and secures over 50% success on multi‑objective lobbing and draping tasks. Predicted parameters transfer well to unseen motions, with a 0.95 Pearson correlation between simulated and real rope dynamics, demonstrating task‑agnostic generalization without retraining.

By Arthur Jakobsson, Abhinav Mahajan, Karthik Pullalarevu, Krishna Suresh, Yunchao Yao, Yuemin Mao, Bardienus Duisterhof, Shahram Najam Syed, Jeffrey Ichnowski
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

Towards Zero-Shot Transfer Across Embodiments For Driving VLAs

The paper investigates how Vision‑Language‑Action (VLA) models can generalise across different driving environments and camera setups. It introduces a multi‑dataset training strategy and an auxiliary objective called BEV‑Forcing, which injects bird‑eye‑view spatial information into the VLA backbone to improve both in‑distribution and out‑of‑distribution performance on a limited number of camera rigs. The authors observe that while BEV‑Forcing helps when training data is scarce, its advantage diminishes as the number of training embodiments grows, suggesting that scaling diversity may reduce the impact of such auxiliary tasks.

By Caio Azevedo, Stefano Sabatini, Sascha Hornauer, Fabien Moutarde