arXiv Machine Learning
Predictively Oriented Gaussian Process Posteriors
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1
Information-Based Calibration of Uncertainty Quantification in Product-of-Experts Gaussian Process Models
arXiv:2608.29349v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Gaussian process (GP) regression with a single global GP (GP-glo) incurs cubic computational cost, limiting scalability to large datasets. Product-of-e...
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 23
A Bayesian Framework for Built-in Input Dimension Reduction for Gaussian Process Modeling
arXiv:2607. 19498v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Gaussian process (GP) modeling is widely used in computational science and engineering.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2
On the Uncertainty Quantification Ability of Tabular Foundation Models
arXiv:2606. 01427v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models (FMs) have achieved substantial success in generalizing across tasks without problemspecific training or fine-tuning.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11
Goal-Oriented Lower-Tail Calibration of Gaussian Processes for Bayesian Optimization
arXiv:2605. 20145v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Gaussian process (GP) predictive distributions are commonly used in Bayesian optimization (BO) to guide the selection of evaluation points for expensive objective functions.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 17
On the Brittleness of Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Gaussian Process Hyperparameter Optimization
arXiv:2608. 13793v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning (ML) has become an indispensable part of modern engineering design workflows.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15
Bayesian Optimisation Using Product-of-Experts Gaussian Process Models with Uncertainty Calibration
The paper introduces BO-pro-c, a Bayesian optimisation algorithm that employs a product-of-experts Gaussian process (GP-pro-c) as its surrogate model. GP-pro-c combines multiple local GP experts to improve uncertainty quantification, reduce computational cost, and preserve global correlations, addressing the cubic complexity of single global GP models. Experiments show that BO-pro-c achieves competitive optimisation performance with a 0.9% lower simple regret and a 39.4% reduction in computational overhead compared to a single‑global‑GP baseline.