arXiv:2512. 09165v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep Operator Networks (DeepONets) have emerged as a powerful framework for data-driven operator learning, providing flexible surrogates for nonlinear mappings arising in partial differential equations (PDEs).
By Muhammad Abid, Omer San
arXiv:2605. 08170v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators have emerged as a powerful tool for learning mappings between infinite-dimensional function spaces.
By Nicole Hao
arXiv:2606. 02427v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing evaluations of neural operators and in-context operator learning rely primarily on prediction error, but accurate output prediction does not guarantee the correct local dynamical structure.
By Zhiwei Gao, Liu Yang, George Em Karniadakis
arXiv:2602. 09530v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce AutoSpec, a neural network framework for discovering iterative spectral algorithms for large-scale numerical linear algebra and numerical optimization.
By Zihang Liu, Oleg Balabanov, Yaoqing Yang, Michael W. Mahoney
arXiv:2609. 18901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In physics-informed machine learning, a target function $u^*$ is learned from noisy value observations $y_i=u^*(x_i)+ \varepsilon_i$, together with differential information, given either by noisy observations $d_j=(Du^*)(z_j)+\xi_j$ or by a known physical constraint $Du^*=v$.
By Luc Brogat-Motte, Joachim Bona-Pellissier, Giacomo Meanti, Lorenzo Rosasco
The paper investigates how many linear samples are needed to learn Lipschitz operators under Gaussian measures. It establishes both lower and upper bounds on the Hermite polynomial approximation error and shows that the minimal worst‑case error cannot converge algebraically with the number of samples. However, if the covariance operator of the Gaussian measure decays rapidly, convergence rates arbitrarily close to any algebraic rate can be achieved.
By Ben Adcock, Michael Griebel, Gregor Maier