arXiv AI
PowerSlider: Exploiting Phase Asymmetry for LLM Serving under Demand Response
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 10
Phase-Decoupled, Model-Calibrated Power Control for Disaggregated LLM Serving
The paper evaluates NVIDIA’s Max‑Q inference profile on a disaggregated B200 GPU system for large language model (LLM) serving, finding modest gains (+8.6% tokens/J) but increased latency (+5.2%). It proposes a phase‑decoupled, model‑calibrated power controller that sets a latency‑guaranteed SM‑clock window for prefill and a calibrated power cap for decode, achieving a 20.4% tokens/J improvement with only a 3.5% latency increase on an 8‑node Qwen3‑Coder‑480B deployment. The approach outperforms vendor profiles on both energy and latency, and demonstrates significant long‑term electricity savings in MoE‑based serving.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11
Phase-Decoupled, Model-Calibrated Power Control for Disaggregated LLM Serving
The paper introduces a phase‑decoupled, model‑calibrated power controller for disaggregated large‑language‑model (LLM) serving, addressing the mismatch between GPU power settings and the distinct hardware regimes of prefill and decode stages. By calibrating separate power caps for each lane based on measured throughput‑latency cliffs, the authors achieve a 20.4% increase in tokens per joule with only a 3.5% rise in mean end‑to‑end latency on an 8‑node B200 cluster, outperforming NVIDIA’s Max‑Q profile. The approach also demonstrates consistent meeting of ITL‑p99 service‑level objectives across multiple MoE models and yields a 32.3% electricity savings over a sustained three‑day run.
arXiv AI
Aug 14
TEMPO: Makespan-Aware Expert-Parallel Load Balancing Across Memory- and Compute-Bound Regimes
arXiv:2608. 13057v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In expert-parallel (EP) MoE serving, every layer synchronizes at the slowest GPU.
arXiv AI
Jul 3
Towards Load-Aware Prefill Deflection for Disaggregated LLM Serving
arXiv:2607. 02043v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Disaggregated LLM serving runs prefill and decode on separate GPU pools to keep the two phases from interfering.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2
Observation, Not Prediction: Conversation-Level Disaggregated Scheduling for Agentic Serving
arXiv:2606. 01839v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based agents resolve a user task through many turns of dependent inference and tool calls, producing a workload whose total cost is unknown when the task arrives.
arXiv AI
Aug 26
Elastic KV Cache for LLM Serving:A Working Reclamation Mechanism, and Why Chunked Prefill Already Closes the Gap
The paper introduces an elastic key‑value (KV) cache for large language model (LLM) serving that dynamically reclaims a pre‑allocated reserve during decode‑heavy phases and restores it before prefill, using a userspace CUDA virtual‑memory trick that requires no driver changes. The authors implement this mechanism, test it under realistic workloads, and find that it offers only marginal benefits—about a 1 % difference in time‑to‑first‑token for large prefill chunks—and that simpler strategies such as lowering the maximum batch size can achieve similar results. The study also notes that the reserve’s impact diminishes with higher tensor‑parallelism levels. whyItMatters":"The work demonstrates that a dynamic KV cache reclamation strategy can be implemented without driver patches and that its practical benefits are limited, guiding future LLM serving optimizations toward simpler approaches."