← Back to all news
Hugging Face Trending Papers

Phase-Decoupled, Model-Calibrated Power Control for Disaggregated LLM Serving

The paper evaluates NVIDIA’s Max‑Q inference profile on a disaggregated B200 GPU system for large language model (LLM) serving, finding modest gains (+8.6% tokens/J) but increased latency (+5.2%). It proposes a phase‑decoupled, model‑calibrated power controller that sets a latency‑guaranteed SM‑clock window for prefill and a calibrated power cap for decode, achieving a 20.4% tokens/J improvement with only a 3.5% latency increase on an 8‑node Qwen3‑Coder‑480B deployment. The approach outperforms vendor profiles on both energy and latency, and demonstrates significant long‑term electricity savings in MoE‑based serving.

Related stories

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Phase-Decoupled, Model-Calibrated Power Control for Disaggregated LLM Serving

The paper introduces a phase‑decoupled, model‑calibrated power controller for disaggregated large‑language‑model (LLM) serving, addressing the mismatch between GPU power settings and the distinct hardware regimes of prefill and decode stages. By calibrating separate power caps for each lane based on measured throughput‑latency cliffs, the authors achieve a 20.4% increase in tokens per joule with only a 3.5% rise in mean end‑to‑end latency on an 8‑node B200 cluster, outperforming NVIDIA’s Max‑Q profile. The approach also demonstrates consistent meeting of ITL‑p99 service‑level objectives across multiple MoE models and yields a 32.3% electricity savings over a sustained three‑day run.

By Jae Gon Kim, Donghoon Yoo, Hanyul Ryu, Sungho Ha, Juyeon Lee, Soojung Ryu
llmsagentsefficiency
More like this →
arXiv AI
Sep 16

Calibrate, Then Route: A Measured Study of Learned Request Routing for Disaggregated LLM Serving

The paper evaluates a learned request‑routing policy for disaggregated large‑language‑model serving, where compute‑heavy prefill and memory‑heavy decode stages run on separate GPU pools. Using a discrete‑event simulator and real NVIDIA A40 GPUs, the calibrated router—leveraging prompt length, predicted output length, KV‑cache pressure, and SLO class—outperforms round‑robin, least‑loaded, and length‑based heuristics, achieving the highest mean goodput (0.864) and lowest variance across three mixed, bursty arrival traces. Hardware calibration proves critical, providing a 4.5‑point goodput boost and roughly 40 % of the tail‑latency advantage, and the learned router can match round‑robin performance with one fewer GPU in certain scenarios.

By Srikanta Datta Tumkur, Jay Iyer, Mehar Simhadri, Sai Pavan Kumar, Sai Kapil Kumar, Ramesh Nampelly
llmsefficiency
More like this →
arXiv AI
Aug 13

Cutting AI Datacenter Energy with Reinforcement Learning: Measured Power Control of LLM Training from One GPU to the Fleet

arXiv:2608. 11226v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement-learning post-training dominates modern language-model development, yet its power behavior on GPU hardware has not been characterized, and datacenters manage GPU power with workload-blind mechanisms, static caps and reactive throttling, that slow hardware indiscriminately.

By Eliseo Curcio
llmsreinforcement-learningefficiency
More like this →
arXiv AI
Jun 16

The Energy Blind Spot: NVIDIA's Flagship Edge AI Hardware Cannot Support Process-Level Energy Attribution

arXiv:2605. 27599v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Agentic AI workloads - where a single user goal triggers multi-step orchestration, tool calls, retries, and failure recovery - are being targeted for edge deployment, with NVIDIA, Dell, HP, ASUS, MSI, Acer, and Gigabyte all shipping GB10-based desktop AI systems in 2026.

By Deepak Panigrahy, Aakash Tyagi
agentsefficiency
More like this →