Hugging Face Trending Papers

Phase-Decoupled, Model-Calibrated Power Control for Disaggregated LLM Serving

The paper evaluates NVIDIA’s Max‑Q inference profile on a disaggregated B200 GPU system for large language model (LLM) serving, finding modest gains (+8.6% tokens/J) but increased latency (+5.2%). It proposes a phase‑decoupled, model‑calibrated power controller that sets a latency‑guaranteed SM‑clock window for prefill and a calibrated power cap for decode, achieving a 20.4% tokens/J improvement with only a 3.5% latency increase on an 8‑node Qwen3‑Coder‑480B deployment. The approach outperforms vendor profiles on both energy and latency, and demonstrates significant long‑term electricity savings in MoE‑based serving.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Phase-Decoupled, Model-Calibrated Power Control for Disaggregated LLM Serving

The paper introduces a phase‑decoupled, model‑calibrated power controller for disaggregated large‑language‑model (LLM) serving, addressing the mismatch between GPU power settings and the distinct hardware regimes of prefill and decode stages. By calibrating separate power caps for each lane based on measured throughput‑latency cliffs, the authors achieve a 20.4% increase in tokens per joule with only a 3.5% rise in mean end‑to‑end latency on an 8‑node B200 cluster, outperforming NVIDIA’s Max‑Q profile. The approach also demonstrates consistent meeting of ITL‑p99 service‑level objectives across multiple MoE models and yields a 32.3% electricity savings over a sustained three‑day run.

By Jae Gon Kim, Donghoon Yoo, Hanyul Ryu, Sungho Ha, Juyeon Lee, Soojung Ryu
arXiv AI
Oct 31

The Illusion of Power Capping in LLM Decode: A Phase-Aware Energy Characterisation Across Attention Architectures

The paper investigates the effectiveness of GPU power capping during large language model (LLM) autoregressive decoding. It finds that power caps have minimal impact on decoding performance because decode kernels are memory‑bound and the GPU idles between launches, drawing less than half its 700 W rating. By instead locking the SM clock, the authors can reduce power consumption by up to 32 % with negligible throughput loss and identify three architecture‑dependent frequency‑scaling classes that influence energy use.

By Bole Ma, Ayesha Afzal, Jan Eitzinger, Gerhard Wellein
arXiv AI
Sep 16

Calibrate, Then Route: A Measured Study of Learned Request Routing for Disaggregated LLM Serving

The paper evaluates a learned request‑routing policy for disaggregated large‑language‑model serving, where compute‑heavy prefill and memory‑heavy decode stages run on separate GPU pools. Using a discrete‑event simulator and real NVIDIA A40 GPUs, the calibrated router—leveraging prompt length, predicted output length, KV‑cache pressure, and SLO class—outperforms round‑robin, least‑loaded, and length‑based heuristics, achieving the highest mean goodput (0.864) and lowest variance across three mixed, bursty arrival traces. Hardware calibration proves critical, providing a 4.5‑point goodput boost and roughly 40 % of the tail‑latency advantage, and the learned router can match round‑robin performance with one fewer GPU in certain scenarios.

By Srikanta Datta Tumkur, Jay Iyer, Mehar Simhadri, Sai Pavan Kumar, Sai Kapil Kumar, Ramesh Nampelly
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Decode-Latency Feedback Prefill: A Model-Free Controller and Its Generalization Limits

The paper introduces Decode‑Latency Feedback Prefill (DLFP), a model‑free controller that adjusts prefill chunk sizes during concurrent autoregressive inference to reduce interference between new and ongoing requests. Implemented in vLLM, DLFP achieves significant reductions in P99 inter‑token latency on Qwen3‑0.6B while maintaining output correctness and SLO compliance, though it fails to generalize to larger models or multi‑GPU setups. The study highlights the limits of this approach and suggests the need for a completion‑timed controller for broader applicability.

By Gaurav Agarwal, Ashish Garg, Isha Singhal
arXiv AI
Aug 13

Cutting AI Datacenter Energy with Reinforcement Learning: Measured Power Control of LLM Training from One GPU to the Fleet

arXiv:2608. 11226v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement-learning post-training dominates modern language-model development, yet its power behavior on GPU hardware has not been characterized, and datacenters manage GPU power with workload-blind mechanisms, static caps and reactive throttling, that slow hardware indiscriminately.

By Eliseo Curcio
arXiv AI
Sep 28

Energy Efficiency of Locally Deployed LLMs: A Preliminary Quantitative GPU Power Benchmark on Consumer Hardware

The paper reports a reproducible GPU power benchmark for 18 open‑source LLMs (0.5B–7B parameters) run on a single consumer RTX 4060ti GPU using the Ollama inference engine. Energy metrics such as mean/peak power, total energy per prompt, energy per output token, and throughput were measured, revealing that model architecture and quantization strategy, rather than parameter count alone, drive energy efficiency. The most efficient models were qwen2.5:0.5b and tinyllama:1.1b, while the 7B‑Mistral model consumed up to 8.6× more energy per token, and qwen3.5:0.8b(on) showed unusually high per‑prompt energy due to extended internal reasoning.

By Philipp M. Z\"ahl, Elja Dalipaj, Anika Hennig, Timon Bayer