arXiv AI By Tianyi Yang, Dawei Fu, Youpeng Wu, Zixun Kou, Linrui Chen, Ruobing Jiang, Zijian Wang, Qiang Li

PosterHarness: Turning Scientific Poster Generation into an Auditable Instruction-Following Benchmark

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 03006v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text-rich image models can now design poster-scale layouts, but we lack ways to measure whether they honor scientific communication contracts: legible labels, prescribed aspect ratios, and -- above all -- abstaining from fabricated scientific figures.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 16

From Transient Prompts to Persistent Control: Scientific Poster Generation via Recursive Semantic-Geometric Contracts

The paper introduces PosterVisor, a framework that replaces transient prompts with persistent control for scientific poster generation. It uses an Orchestrator to compile rubrics into Semantic‑Geometric Contracts that bind claims, sources, visuals, budgets, and spatial commitments, and employs Recursive Contract Enforcement to dynamically trigger checks and prevent silent regressions. Implementations in HTML/CSS and PPTX show improved QA accuracy and higher human preference on benchmark datasets.

By Runze Li, Yukun Zhao, Can Xu, Yucheng Shen, Shuaiqiang Wang, Jianmin Wu, Lingyong Yan, Dawei Yin
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 17

ReFigBench: Benchmarking Scientific Figure Reconstruction as Editable PowerPoint Artifacts

ReFigBench is a benchmark that evaluates how well multimodal coding agents can transform scientific overview figures into editable PowerPoint slides, preserving text, layout, and document structure. The study uses 1,000 real figures from arXiv, testing agents from four model families across two workflows—direct code generation and a specialized PPTX workflow—within ten different harness configurations. Evaluation combines deterministic artifact checks, automated scoring by judges, and blinded human comparisons, revealing that workflow and harness choices significantly affect reconstruction quality and that even the best agents fall short of the ideal rubric.

By Liyang Fan, Chi Wei, Yitai Li, Xinping Bi, Guhong Chen, Chenghao Sun, Haoxiang Yang, Qingwen Li, Kai Yan, Hong Li, Bo Li
arXiv AI
Jul 31

SciFigAlign: Scoring Scientific Figures by Fine-tuned Alignment of Visuals with Manuscript Evidence

arXiv:2607. 27066v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific figure assessment in peer review differs fundamentally from general image quality evaluation: a figure must be visually legible, faithfully support the manuscript's claims, and communicate evidence with a clear visual hierarchy.

By Chuanzhi Xu, Zihan Deng, Huiqi Liang, Chengkun Yue, Zhanlin Cui, Pengfei Ye, Weidong Cai
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 5

ResearchStudio-Reel: Automate the Last Mile of Research from Paper to Poster, Video, and Blog

Research dissemination, turning a paper into a poster, a talk video, and a blog post, is still a manual last mile. Prior automation treats each artifact in isolation that each re-extract the paper from scratch, usually ship one-way renders the author cannot reopen in PowerPoint or Word, and gates quality on soft VLM-preference scores that plateau while load-bearing sections still read as empty.