arXiv AI
PAPER2LLM++: Continual Self-Evolution of LLMs from Research Papers
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 2
EvoSCM: Scientific Belief Revision Through Causal Model Evolution and Experimentation
arXiv:2609.01526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific agents must learn not only how to reason, but also what to believe. However, existing LLM agents typically express scientific hypotheses in...
arXiv AI
4d ago
LabBook: Harnessing Experimental History for Efficient LLM-Driven Discovery
arXiv:2610.00675v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Evolutionary approaches to LLM-driven discovery often generate new programs from a small set of selected ancestors. This keeps contexts manageable bu...
arXiv AI
Aug 19
AutoResearch: Insight In, Hallucination Out
AutoResearch is a two‑stage autonomous research system that links Idea Generation with Idea Execution. In the generation phase it blends new research signals with existing domain knowledge, identifies transferable mechanistic insights, and produces grounded, testable research plans through multi‑model generation and cross‑review. The execution phase then decomposes these plans into experiments, iteratively implements and diagnoses them, and uses independent evidence‑based review to accept or revise conclusions, thereby turning ideas into measurable progress while minimizing hallucinations.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 10
When Does Continual Learning Require Learning
arXiv:2607. 07847v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly capable, the next question is how can we enable models to continually learn?
arXiv AI
5d ago
ConflictGuide: AutoResearch Improves When Competing Behaviors Are Made Visible
The paper introduces ConflictGuide, a method that enhances LLM-based AutoResearch by incorporating feedback on competing behaviors during model code editing. By first exploring with scalar task performance and then using probes to measure and alleviate conflicts, ConflictGuide increases the proportion of edits that improve multiple behaviors and sustains progress beyond scalar-only plateaus. Experiments across five model families show reductions in task and conflict-related errors by up to 28% and 14% compared to scalar-only AutoResearch.
arXiv AI
Aug 11
Beyond Static Models: An Evolving Framework for Continual Learning in Large Language Models across Training Stages
arXiv:2603. 12658v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Continual learning (CL) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm to enable large language models (LLMs) to dynamically adapt to evolving knowledge and sequential tasks while mitigating catastrophic forgetting, a critical limitation of the static pre-training paradigm inherent to modern LLMs.